7.
 
Re: Morning Interviews
Aug 4, 2016, 13:01
7.
Re: Morning Interviews Aug 4, 2016, 13:01
Aug 4, 2016, 13:01
 
Quboid wrote on Aug 4, 2016, 11:01:
It is rather cack-handed marketing. Is there a specific 'apartheid' controversy, or is it just that the game includes segregation? I'm in favour of games tackling such issues even if the result is likely to be a bit of a caricature.

The controversy is or was that they were calling it "apartheid" which stands for a unique kind of segregation and lots of injustice and suffering in South Africa.
I don't think that anyone had a problem with the segregation theme per se (many games/RPGs had those in the past) but only with using the term apartheid which probably should not be tampered with in this way.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
2.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
3.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
4.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
5.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
6.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
 7.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
  Re: Morning Interviews
8.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
9.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
11.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
12.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
13.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
14.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
15.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
10.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
16.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
17.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
18.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
19.
Aug 4, 2016Aug 4 2016
20.
Aug 5, 2016Aug 5 2016
21.
Aug 5, 2016Aug 5 2016
22.
Aug 5, 2016Aug 5 2016
23.
Aug 5, 2016Aug 5 2016