23 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
 |
| 23. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 3, 2016, 17:47 |
NKD |
|
|
Shineyguy wrote on Aug 3, 2016, 09:28:
jdreyer wrote on Aug 3, 2016, 05:16:
Man, can't wait to build my quad-SLI Titan X machine. My Vive will run like buttah.
Too bad SLI is now limited to two cards unless you're benchmarking..
Also too bad SLI doesn't work with Vive currently... jdreyer's dream is dead. At least for the time being. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 22. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 3, 2016, 09:28 |
Shineyguy |
|
|
jdreyer wrote on Aug 3, 2016, 05:16:
Man, can't wait to build my quad-SLI Titan X machine. My Vive will run like buttah.
Too bad SLI is now limited to two cards unless you're benchmarking.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 21. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 3, 2016, 05:16 |
jdreyer |
|
|
| Man, can't wait to build my quad-SLI Titan X machine. My Vive will run like buttah. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Me: Waiting for the inevitable parody, Battleporn.
Drayth: Just don't Overwatch too much. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 20. |
Re: Morning Mobilization |
Aug 2, 2016, 20:05 |
Luke |
|
|
Tom wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 19:09:
Titan has always been about paying a lot more for a little more power, to be at the top end. So what? Obviously there's demand for it. I've seen countless specs on PC builds that list one or more Titan cards.
Plot performance vs. value for all these cards and choose where you're comfortable at given what you want to do and how much money you want to spend. It's pretty easy and it's been like this for about as long as GPUs have existed.
Maybe but the thing is those who just GOTTA have the fastest card have yet again been buttF now they only have the second best card and it's tearing those appart inside.....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 19. |
Re: Morning Mobilization |
Aug 2, 2016, 19:09 |
Tom |
|
|
Titan has always been about paying a lot more for a little more power, to be at the top end. So what? Obviously there's demand for it. I've seen countless specs on PC builds that list one or more Titan cards.
Plot performance vs. value for all these cards and choose where you're comfortable at given what you want to do and how much money you want to spend. It's pretty easy and it's been like this for about as long as GPUs have existed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 18. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 18:57 |
SlimRam |
|
|
HorrorScope wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 17:23:
I can't start to tell you the quality of the pixels this thing puts out. Yeah but...let's talk about how the shroud looks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 17. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 17:23 |
HorrorScope |
|
|
| I can't start to tell you the quality of the pixels this thing puts out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 16. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 15:58 |
Slick |
|
|
CJ_Parker wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:45:
Tipsy McStagger wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:38:
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:29:
Well this naming scheme isn't at all going to be confusing as hell....
I'm already confused.. Was the last one the Titan Black?
No, the last one was the "nVidia GeForce GTX TitanX" and this one is the "nVidia TitanX" (note the absence of GeForce and GTX). They are trying to distinguish it from the gaming cards in spite of the absence of FP64.
I think it's about keeping an idea of value about this line throughout all generations. It's like owning a Porsche. doesn't matter if it's a 2017 model, or a 2007 model. People generally just see "Porsche". Will probably help people resell those cards in the future. I can just see some craigslist ad: "including TITAN X GPU!!!" looks impressive, could be a 3 year old model, who cares, Porsche! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Stop equating theft and software piracy. It's not the same thing and it makes you look stupid. -VaranDragon |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 15. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 15:45 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
Tipsy McStagger wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:38:
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:29:
Well this naming scheme isn't at all going to be confusing as hell....
I'm already confused.. Was the last one the Titan Black?
No, the last one was the "nVidia GeForce GTX TitanX" and this one is the "nVidia TitanX" (note the absence of GeForce and GTX). They are trying to distinguish it from the gaming cards in spite of the absence of FP64. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 15:40 |
nin |
|
|
Tipsy McStagger wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:38:
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:29:
Well this naming scheme isn't at all going to be confusing as hell....
I'm already confused.. Was the last one the Titan Black?
I believe there's two different generations of card labeled Titan X, hence the confusion? Not positive...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 15:38 |
Tipsy McStagger |
|
|
eRe4s3r wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 15:29:
Well this naming scheme isn't at all going to be confusing as hell....
I'm already confused.. Was the last one the Titan Black?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 15:29 |
eRe4s3r |
|
|
| Well this naming scheme isn't at all going to be confusing as hell.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 15:18 |
HoSpanky |
|
|
ForgedReality wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 12:56:
VaranDragon wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 12:11:
Actually no, you are wrong. These are intended as top of the line Gaming cards. Nvidia already has professional graphics workstation cards, they are called Quadro. Actually the Titans are cheap compared to the top of the line Quadro cards.
That, and ever since Maxwel Titan X, they haven't been given FP64 acceleration, unlike the prior Titans. So, really, they're not that great at compute tasks, so they're just rich gamer cards now.
I was considering this card before Pascal was released, but seeing its performance (and price) has me backing off a bit. I'd like to see someone overclock it to proper speeds and benchmark that. I'm kind of doubting a 1080 Ti will exist at this point.
Did not realize they disabled the fp64 support. Well yeah, ok, so these are now just absurdly overpriced cards for people who enjoy not using what they paid extra for. 12gb of video memory? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 14:57 |
Bundy |
|
|
ForgedReality wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 12:56:
VaranDragon wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 12:11:
Actually no, you are wrong. These are intended as top of the line Gaming cards. Nvidia already has professional graphics workstation cards, they are called Quadro. Actually the Titans are cheap compared to the top of the line Quadro cards.
That, and ever since Maxwel Titan X, they haven't been given FP64 acceleration, unlike the prior Titans. So, really, they're not that great at compute tasks, so they're just rich gamer cards now.
I was considering this card before Pascal was released, but seeing its performance (and price) has me backing off a bit. I'd like to see someone overclock it to proper speeds and benchmark that. I'm kind of doubting a 1080 Ti will exist at this point.
I figured the 1080 Ti will be their HBM2 part released next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 14:21 |
SlimRam |
|
|
| They had me at "most desirable shrouds". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 13:39 |
CJ_Parker |
|
|
ForgedReality wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 12:56:
I'm kind of doubting a 1080 Ti will exist at this point.
I'm sure it will be coming. They need to do something with the partially defunct GP-102 cores and the huge gap between the $699 GTX 1080 and the $1200 Titan is just begging to be filled by a $999(FE)/$899(custom) GTX 1080Ti like... maybe in October? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 13:02 |
RedEye9 |
|
|
GinRummy wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 10:40:
They should lease these things to gamers, $100 a month and you get an upgraded Titan X every 10 to 15 months. Older returned ones to be sold refurbished for $250.
They pay shipping both ways, sign me up. For an extra twee fiddy they will send 2 for sli goodness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 12:56 |
ForgedReality |
|
|
VaranDragon wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 12:11:
Actually no, you are wrong. These are intended as top of the line Gaming cards. Nvidia already has professional graphics workstation cards, they are called Quadro. Actually the Titans are cheap compared to the top of the line Quadro cards.
That, and ever since Maxwel Titan X, they haven't been given FP64 acceleration, unlike the prior Titans. So, really, they're not that great at compute tasks, so they're just rich gamer cards now.
I was considering this card before Pascal was released, but seeing its performance (and price) has me backing off a bit. I'd like to see someone overclock it to proper speeds and benchmark that. I'm kind of doubting a 1080 Ti will exist at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 12:11 |
VaranDragon |
|
|
| Actually no, you are wrong. These are intended as top of the line Gaming cards. Nvidia already has professional graphics workstation cards, they are called Quadro. Actually the Titans are cheap compared to the top of the line Quadro cards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: New Titan X Released |
Aug 2, 2016, 11:46 |
HoSpanky |
|
|
Well, shit, my 1080 is scheduled to arrive today, guess I should just deny delivery and order something twice as expensive with a 15% gain!
GinRummy wrote on Aug 2, 2016, 10:40:
They should lease these things to gamers, $100 a month and you get an upgraded Titan X every 10 to 15 months. Older returned ones to be sold refurbished for $250.
Heh, leased video cards sounds harder to control than just leasing entire machines. The sort of person who would lease equipment isn't usually the same sort of person who would want to install it.
Also, these cards are not intended as gaming cards. They're of course quite capable at it, but they're intended for other purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
23 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
