Rilcon wrote on Jul 22, 2016, 05:23:
"patenting math is bullshit"
What's the difference between complex mathematical equations and computer code?
Nothing - hence why software patents are absolute bullshit
Rilcon wrote on Jul 22, 2016, 05:23:
What makes the years of study and research to figure out a consistent way of generating certain geographic shapes worth less than the lines of code to make a few pixels move up and down a screen?
I don't know what planet you live on where effort automatically generates value, but I am curious about the price of an air-fare. It would be fantastic to just do whatever I want and not have to worry about paying the bills.
Or maybe I am misunderstanding the point you are trying to make. You should perhaps just state your argument rather than asking it as a question.
Rilcon wrote on Jul 22, 2016, 05:23:
This isn't patenting "2+2=4", it's patenting the equivalent of a an instruction manual to build a car.
A manual is not patentable.
I know this is likely a troll but I couldn't help myself. There was just so much stupid there, even for a blue news comment.