12.
 
Re: Evening Legal Briefs
Jul 22, 2016, 07:56
PHJF
 
12.
Re: Evening Legal Briefs Jul 22, 2016, 07:56
Jul 22, 2016, 07:56
 PHJF
 
How can a company not patent a mathematical formula but they can patent the application of a mathematical formula? That doesn't make sense. Either a math formula is completely patent free or the Supreme Court ruling is meaningless.

Because patents are ALL ABOUT APPLICATION of an idea, not the idea itself.

You can SAY you're going to invent or create X to accomplish Y, but until you have the specific action or means by which to do it you aren't getting a patent for it.

The problem with patents concerning software is software is so fucking complex and patent offices so not brimming with elite coders that the scope of what is patentable and what isn't is now nebulous at best.
Steam + PSN: PHJF
Avatar 17251
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 21, 2016Jul 21 2016
2.
Jul 21, 2016Jul 21 2016
3.
Jul 21, 2016Jul 21 2016
4.
Jul 21, 2016Jul 21 2016
5.
Jul 21, 2016Jul 21 2016
6.
Jul 21, 2016Jul 21 2016
7.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
8.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
9.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
10.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
11.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
 12.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
      Re: Evening Legal Briefs
13.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016
14.
Jul 22, 2016Jul 22 2016