Jackplug wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 12:31:
Like all Battlefields, they all look amazing until you play them.
The Half Elf wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 12:12:Techie714 © wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 11:51:
Only 15 seconds but it looks pretty awesome so far.
And Battlefront is visual/audio masterpiece, but hands-on time proved to be something else entirely.
jdreyer wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 13:29:The Half Elf wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 12:12:Techie714 © wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 11:51:
Only 15 seconds but it looks pretty awesome so far.
And Battlefront is visual/audio masterpiece, but hands-on time proved to be something else entirely.
I expect this to be closer to BF3/4 than Battefront, especially given the source material.
jdreyer wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 13:29:The Half Elf wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 12:12:Techie714 © wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 11:51:
Only 15 seconds but it looks pretty awesome so far.
And Battlefront is visual/audio masterpiece, but hands-on time proved to be something else entirely.
I expect this to be closer to BF3/4 than Battefront, especially given the source material.
The Half Elf wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 14:48:jdreyer wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 13:29:The Half Elf wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 12:12:Techie714 © wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 11:51:
Only 15 seconds but it looks pretty awesome so far.
And Battlefront is visual/audio masterpiece, but hands-on time proved to be something else entirely.
I expect this to be closer to BF3/4 than Battefront, especially given the source material.
Yes but also Battlefront 1/2 had a great system that worked well and the 2nd game was expanded further to make it better.
Hardlines used BF3/4's system and was a failure due to being a high priced mod with not enough unique features.
So what will they do with BF1? That's what I want to know.
Fantaz wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 15:15:
in reality, all of the soldiers were inexperienced in World War 1 and wouldn't be that good like they are in this game or like the 1 man army super soldiers in WW2 shooters and other FPS games.
Techie714 © wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 11:51:But it's a cutscene and EA!
Only 15 seconds but it looks pretty awesome so far.
DangerDog wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 17:19:
Battlefield games are only authentic...
CJ_Parker wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 19:38:
There is absolutely nothing "authentic" about the retarded garbage you can see in this trailer. It is much too actiony and fast-paced. If you would fly at the velocity and pull off a single maneuver from the trailer with a real WW1 plane, it would crumble to tiny little dust particles mid-air due to total structural failure.
CJ_Parker wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 19:38:DangerDog wrote on Jun 12, 2016, 17:19:
Battlefield games are only authentic...
You're joking, right?
There is absolutely nothing "authentic" about the retarded garbage you can see in this trailer. It is much too actiony and fast-paced. If you would fly at the velocity and pull off a single maneuver from the trailer with a real WW1 plane, it would crumble to tiny little dust particles mid-air due to total structural failure.
Also, no problem with two shooters for EA. The mouthbreathers who are easily impressed by trailers will just preorder both (10+ million Star Wars Battlefront sales do not lie). Works every time. EA knows exactly how retarded their customers are (or have become).