5.
 
Re: Morning Tech Bits
Mar 23, 2016, 13:09
5.
Re: Morning Tech Bits Mar 23, 2016, 13:09
Mar 23, 2016, 13:09
 
Beamer wrote on Mar 23, 2016, 12:28:
Cutter wrote on Mar 23, 2016, 11:54:
Why it doesn't matter? Spoken like someone with zero responsibilities or bills.

And your post is spoken like someone too lazy to ever read the articles he comments on. His point is that technology is always expensive for early adopters, and dismissing it out of hand now due to that fact is incorrect. If there's merit to VR, early adopters will support it through its infancy until the technology matures and the price falls enough for it to hit the mainstream.

15 years ago the price of a 40" TV was insane. Anyone claiming it was proof 40" TVs wouldn't take off would have been proven wrong. Do I agree that the early adopters will be able to sustain VR long enough for it to move down the innovation curve? I'm not convinced, but there's an enormous amount of money out there to help it out.

Not to mention these VR headsets are pretty cheap compared to the prices of a lot of new technology, such as TV screens, when they first come out.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
2.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
3.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
 5.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
  Re: Morning Tech Bits
11.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
16.
Mar 24, 2016Mar 24 2016
4.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
6.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
8.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
12.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
13.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
7.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
9.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
10.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
14.
Mar 23, 2016Mar 23 2016
15.
Mar 24, 2016Mar 24 2016