11.
 
Re: Saturday Legal Briefs
Feb 13, 2016, 19:03
11.
Re: Saturday Legal Briefs Feb 13, 2016, 19:03
Feb 13, 2016, 19:03
 
NKD wrote on Feb 13, 2016, 17:56:
I don't believe anyone who says they pirate a game, play it, and then buy it if they are satisfied. Yeah, maybe they buy it on a Steam sale 2 years later when they want to re-play it, but they aren't slapping down $50-60 when it really counts in the first critical couple weeks of sales.
Well, lots of players do buy it at release if the pirated copy works well. Case in point is the Call of Duty games, which these days are notorious for being horrible PC ports. Plenty pirate the game (offline play only of course), test it, then if it runs well, they buy it so they can play online.

So many games that have Achievements, Leaderboards, Coop, or Multiplayer still have strong incentives to legally buy it even if you can pirate.

But yeah, a lot of people will pirate and never buy. Those people also would be very unlikely to buy in the first place. But that's the classic debate that has raged for decades.

El Pit wrote on Feb 13, 2016, 15:11:
Brumbek trying his best to justify what he intended to do from the beginning... Obvious.

Brumbek orders a pizza. The pizza is not okay, so he asks for a refund. Problem solved.

Brumbek buys a game from Steam. The game is not okay. so he asks for a refund. Problem solved.

But Brumbek says Nooooo, not good enough. I need to eat at least half of the pizza, ahm, play hours of the game.
I admire your attempt at creativity. And your liberal use of Brumbek.

I just think a lot of gamers aren't mature business-minded people. In business office settings it isn't uncommon to get a new printer/scanner/equipment and use it for a week or even a month before deciding on a final purchase decision.

And yet, I'm accused of being a greedy pizza jerk because I also want assurances the game functions as intended after 5 or 10 hours of play.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
2.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
3.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
8.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
4.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
6.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
7.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
9.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
10.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
12.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
19.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
21.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
22.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
14.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
20.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
23.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
15.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
 11.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
 Re: Saturday Legal Briefs
18.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
31.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
5.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
13.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
16.
Feb 13, 2016Feb 13 2016
17.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
24.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
25.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
26.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
27.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
28.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
29.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016
30.
Feb 14, 2016Feb 14 2016