Flak wrote on Aug 25, 2015, 17:19:
4D-Boxing wrote on Aug 25, 2015, 15:40:
IMHO, this game lives because of the lack of alternatives.
We have a winner!
I'll play every MP shooter under the sun and they still don't compare to Battlefield.
It's less about Battlefield being really good, and more about the other games being pretty bad.
Battlefield wins...by default.
I don't disagree. It's an amazing experience and simply looks amazing on the right rig. That being said, it's had it's growing pains to say the least. Still get the occasional rubber banding when someone with a good ping scopes me with a weapon or vehicle. I take it as a warning and move on if possible. Outside of that, the only thing missing is the "tightness" of the controls.
Started playing again after getting a XB270HU, so 6months off. Yes, the game has vastly improved. "tightest" BF game to date by far but still not were it should be. Started playing UT4 as well, got schooled and still getting schooled but, because it's "tight" I've adapted and expect to hold my own if I play regularly. With BF4 each encounter is still a dice roll (i don't DMR or shotgun just regular assault). I don't mean that bf4 has to feel like UT, CS or even call, the game is still lacking in response and lateral movement. Arma 3 isn't as good but it feels "tighter" for some reason. I admit that though I'm over 40, I prefer twitch shooters and am way better at them but, capping flags in bf4, i still get frustrating deaths.