Op Ed

Massively Overpowered - Star Citizen is still worth the wait.
"Or we could be real and realize that Star Citizen was announced in October of 2012. Even if we use that as ground zero and ignore the fact that the game didn’t morph into the virtual world beast that it is today for several additional months, that was under three years ago. Can you name a triple-A MMOlike with Star Citizen’s feature set (even its early, trimmed-down feature set), and its visual fidelity that shipped in under three years?"

View : : :
67.
 
Re: Op Ed
Jul 13, 2015, 07:55
67.
Re: Op Ed Jul 13, 2015, 07:55
Jul 13, 2015, 07:55
 
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Jul 13, 2015, 07:27:
What does that have to do with anything? We know the game was originally going to be developed on a much smaller budget and was expanded because of the extra investment. If the game was being developed to the original scale and fidelity level people would be accusing him of fraud, of pocketing all the extra money.

Jesus Christ, people ARE accusing him of fraud! Worse than that, they are accusing him of incompetence and greed! If he had kept the scope of the project along the original KS goals, we wouldnt be talking about any of this. Among other things Chris Roberts literaly said give me more money so I can build the game FASTER. That's what CR said, do you deny it? You seem to do a lot of denying when reality needs to conform to your perception of it.
I have a nifty blue line!
Avatar 46994
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
2.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
3.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
4.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
6.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
19.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
20.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
   Re: Op Ed
29.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
    No subject
21.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
   Re: Op Ed
28.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
   Re: Op Ed
70.
Jul 18, 2015Jul 18 2015
   Re: Op Ed
5.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
7.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
15.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
16.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
36.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
39.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
   Re: Op Ed
40.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
    Re: Op Ed
18.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
25.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
27.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
8.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
14.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
10.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
11.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
13.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
17.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
26.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
   Re: Op Ed
12.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
22.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
23.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
24.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
30.
Jul 11, 2015Jul 11 2015
31.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
32.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
35.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
38.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
46.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
53.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
   Re: Op Ed
54.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
    Re: Op Ed
55.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
     Re: Op Ed
58.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
      Re: Op Ed
59.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
       Re: Op Ed
56.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
     Re: Op Ed
33.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
34.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
37.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
41.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
44.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
   Re: Op Ed
45.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
    Re: Op Ed
51.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
     Re: Op Ed
52.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
      Re: Op Ed
60.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
      Re: Op Ed
47.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
    Re: Op Ed
48.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
     Re: Op Ed
42.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
43.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
50.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
57.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
49.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
61.
Jul 12, 2015Jul 12 2015
62.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015
66.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015
 67.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015
  Re: Op Ed
69.
Jul 14, 2015Jul 14 2015
   Re: Op Ed
71.
Jul 18, 2015Jul 18 2015
   Re: Op Ed
63.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015
64.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015
65.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015
68.
Jul 13, 2015Jul 13 2015