14.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Jan 16, 2015, 14:07
14.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jan 16, 2015, 14:07
Jan 16, 2015, 14:07
 
MEAHT wrote on Jan 16, 2015, 11:57:
Puts officers at risk

But more importantly it puts you, your wife your kids and any pets with even a hint of a growl at risk.

Puts officers at risk? Couldn't care less for them since that is what they signed up for. They are civil servants who put their lives at stake to protect the innocent. Cases like this, I worry more for those that officers are sworn to protect since you can't count on cops to protect them.

It's more likely those swatted will have flashbangs used against them and be indiscriminately hurt without recourse than any cop being harmed.
Avatar 55372
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
2.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
3.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
4.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
8.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
11.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
5.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
6.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
7.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
9.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
12.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
 14.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
     Re: Morning Legal Briefs
25.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
29.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
28.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
10.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
13.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
24.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
15.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
16.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
17.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
18.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
21.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
26.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
31.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
34.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
35.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
38.
Jan 17, 2015Jan 17 2015
39.
Jan 17, 2015Jan 17 2015
19.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
20.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
23.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
30.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
36.
Jan 17, 2015Jan 17 2015
37.
Jan 17, 2015Jan 17 2015
32.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
33.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
22.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015
27.
Jan 16, 2015Jan 16 2015