UHD wrote on Sep 9, 2014, 10:42:
No, it means "Watergate" was an actual scandal that had significant real-world consequences, whereas "Gamergate" is inconsequential and only has importance if you get mad when someone you don't know says something vague but negative about your preferred subculture.
So you mean that journalistic malfeasance that we've been seeing over the last two weeks doesn't have any real-world consequences? Would that be like journolist not being important as well, because already knew that reporters in the msm were colluding on stories.
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."