40.
 
Re: Morning Legal Briefs
Jul 31, 2014, 08:16
NKD
40.
Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 31, 2014, 08:16
Jul 31, 2014, 08:16
NKD
 
jdreyer wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 03:23:
NKD wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 02:17:
jdreyer wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 01:57:
The suspect's story sounds plausible, so I guess we'll just have to wait and see. It's odd that he describes her as a "close friend" yet claimed that he thought she was 20, supposedly not knowing she just turned 17. On the other hand, if you only saw her in costume and makeup all the time, it might be easy to make the assumption she was older. I assume the guy who was arrested was the Project Cosplay guy that took the Daphne and Velma pics on her Facebook page.

If, like he claims, they aren't sexually involved, then he probably wasn't worrying too much about fact-checking her age.

Yup, although it looks like he was taking some pics of her in a hotel bedroom? Also, there's a weak implication with this pic that she's his girlfriend (although this could be just a pic to make the joke, too). I'll probably forget about this by tomorrow, but it would be interesting to know the final outcome of this case. Whoever did this to that poor girl seriously fucked her up. She deserves justice and the perp (whoever he is) deserves a long jail sentence.

EDIT: Actually, he calls her his girlfriend in his July 2 post:
Check out this awesome video From #ClubCosplay. Relly informative about getting the nerd culture on the club scene! also check out my awesome Girl Friend and I at at 0:54!
Here's the video where the girl kisses him at the :54 mark. It's obviously "Milly" in her witch costume (another, different bedroom shot). So even if he didn't beat her up, these charges will probably end up sticking: He was booked into San Diego County Jail at 11:20 am on charges of sexual contact with a minor and contributing to the delinquency of minor. Although, I will say that it's stupid that the age of consent for Cali is 18. If this had taken place in most other states, there'd be no charges filed.

Good internet sleuthing. So potentially either she or her boyfriend copped to the relationship when the police were talking to them, but she indicated he wasn't involved in what happened to her. That would explain how he'd be charged with those other things but not assault. But we really don't know I guess.

Though if he wasn't involved in this attack, I agree it's bullshit that the police are giving him a hard time. 16 and 17 are considered old enough to be making your own relationship decisions in virtually all of the civilized world and many states here in the US.

It's not like the dude is running around preying on little kids. Girl is taller and older looking than he is.

Luckily for this dude, in California, these statutory charges don't get you on the big bad sex offender list if they are at least 16. The prosecutor can also choose to charge it as a misdemeanor if they are feeling nice, and since she is not under 16 even if he gets hit with the felony, the penalties are a lot less.

But yeah, I worry that if this guy is not the attacker then they may never catch who did this. They could be in another state or country by now for all we know.
"Sometimes, there are two sides. But more often, one side says it is a car. And one side says it is an umbrella. And only one is right. And the other one doesn’t deserve our attention." -Shepard Smith
Avatar 43041
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
4.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
5.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
6.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
7.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
8.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
9.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
10.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
11.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
12.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
        Re: Morning Legal Briefs
13.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
         Re: Morning Legal Briefs
2.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
3.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
14.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
15.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
16.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
28.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
17.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
19.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
18.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
20.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
21.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
22.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
23.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
24.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
25.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
26.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
31.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
27.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
32.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
29.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
30.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
33.
Jul 30, 2014Jul 30 2014
41.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
34.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
35.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
36.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
37.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
38.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
39.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
 40.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014
   Re: Morning Legal Briefs
42.
Jul 31, 2014Jul 31 2014