Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - RSS Headlines   RSS Headlines   Twitter   Twitter

Morning Legal Briefs

View

40. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jul 31, 2014, 08:16 NKD
 
jdreyer wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 03:23:
NKD wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 02:17:
jdreyer wrote on Jul 31, 2014, 01:57:
The suspect's story sounds plausible, so I guess we'll just have to wait and see. It's odd that he describes her as a "close friend" yet claimed that he thought she was 20, supposedly not knowing she just turned 17. On the other hand, if you only saw her in costume and makeup all the time, it might be easy to make the assumption she was older. I assume the guy who was arrested was the Project Cosplay guy that took the Daphne and Velma pics on her Facebook page.

If, like he claims, they aren't sexually involved, then he probably wasn't worrying too much about fact-checking her age.

Yup, although it looks like he was taking some pics of her in a hotel bedroom? Also, there's a weak implication with this pic that she's his girlfriend (although this could be just a pic to make the joke, too). I'll probably forget about this by tomorrow, but it would be interesting to know the final outcome of this case. Whoever did this to that poor girl seriously fucked her up. She deserves justice and the perp (whoever he is) deserves a long jail sentence.

EDIT: Actually, he calls her his girlfriend in his July 2 post:
Check out this awesome video From #ClubCosplay. Relly informative about getting the nerd culture on the club scene! also check out my awesome Girl Friend and I at at 0:54!
Here's the video where the girl kisses him at the :54 mark. It's obviously "Milly" in her witch costume (another, different bedroom shot). So even if he didn't beat her up, these charges will probably end up sticking: He was booked into San Diego County Jail at 11:20 am on charges of sexual contact with a minor and contributing to the delinquency of minor. Although, I will say that it's stupid that the age of consent for Cali is 18. If this had taken place in most other states, there'd be no charges filed.

Good internet sleuthing. So potentially either she or her boyfriend copped to the relationship when the police were talking to them, but she indicated he wasn't involved in what happened to her. That would explain how he'd be charged with those other things but not assault. But we really don't know I guess.

Though if he wasn't involved in this attack, I agree it's bullshit that the police are giving him a hard time. 16 and 17 are considered old enough to be making your own relationship decisions in virtually all of the civilized world and many states here in the US.

It's not like the dude is running around preying on little kids. Girl is taller and older looking than he is.

Luckily for this dude, in California, these statutory charges don't get you on the big bad sex offender list if they are at least 16. The prosecutor can also choose to charge it as a misdemeanor if they are feeling nice, and since she is not under 16 even if he gets hit with the felony, the penalties are a lot less.

But yeah, I worry that if this guy is not the attacker then they may never catch who did this. They could be in another state or country by now for all we know.
 
Avatar 43041
 



Welcome to the Retirement Home for Old People Terrified Of Change
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jul 30, 11:50 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Eirikrautha
  4. Jul 30, 12:49  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  5. Jul 30, 13:11   removed harlock
  6. Jul 30, 13:17   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Eirikrautha
  7. Jul 30, 13:23    Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  8. Jul 30, 13:31     Re: Morning Legal Briefs Beamer
  9. Jul 30, 13:40      Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  10. Jul 30, 13:57       Re: Morning Legal Briefs Beamer
  11. Jul 30, 14:19        Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  12. Jul 30, 14:26         Re: Morning Legal Briefs Beamer
  13. Jul 30, 14:37          Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  2. Jul 30, 12:03 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Wallshadows
  3. Jul 30, 12:41 Re: Morning Legal Briefs harlock
  14. Jul 30, 14:49 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Creston
  15. Jul 30, 15:48 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jivaro
  16. Jul 30, 15:59  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  28. Jul 30, 20:34   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Quboid
  17. Jul 30, 16:07  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Verno
  19. Jul 30, 17:04  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Creston
  18. Jul 30, 17:00 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jivaro
  20. Jul 30, 17:13 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jivaro
  21. Jul 30, 17:49  Re: Morning Legal Briefs jdreyer
  22. Jul 30, 17:51   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jivaro
  23. Jul 30, 17:54    Re: Morning Legal Briefs jdreyer
  24. Jul 30, 18:48 Re: Morning Legal Briefs 1badmf
  25. Jul 30, 19:35  No subject Mashiki Amiketo
  26. Jul 30, 20:00  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Redmask
  31. Jul 30, 22:07  Re: Morning Legal Briefs jdreyer
  27. Jul 30, 20:20 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Silicon Avatar
  32. Jul 30, 22:47  Re: Morning Legal Briefs jdreyer
  29. Jul 30, 21:11 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Silicon Avatar
  30. Jul 30, 21:33  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Quboid
  33. Jul 30, 23:49  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  41. Jul 31, 12:02  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Verno
  34. Jul 31, 01:26 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jivaro
  35. Jul 31, 01:47  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  36. Jul 31, 01:57 Re: Morning Legal Briefs jdreyer
  37. Jul 31, 02:17  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  38. Jul 31, 03:23   Re: Morning Legal Briefs jdreyer
  39. Jul 31, 07:17    Re: Morning Legal Briefs Julio
>> 40. Jul 31, 08:16    Re: Morning Legal Briefs NKD
  42. Jul 31, 22:16 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Jivaro