On May 15, 2012, the gates of the Burning Hells opened and Diablo III was unleashed onto the world. Since then, millions of heroes have been created, billions of hours have been spent in games, and trillions of demons have been slaughtered without mercy. We've even released an expansion!
To celebrate the game's second anniversary and the community that made it all possible, players who log in to defend Sanctuary this week will receive double Rift Fragments as well as a +100% boost to their chance to find Legendary items. This bonus birthday buff begins in the Americas on Thursday, May 15 at 12:00 a.m. PDT and ends on Thursday, May 22 at 5:00 a.m. PDT.
Mr. Tact wrote on May 18, 2014, 20:26:Yeah, east of L.A. in the small mountain/huge hilly areas. No DSL (too far to CO), fiber, etc. Bleh.
You have cable and it's not stable? That seems odd, I take it you are semi-rural?
Mr. Tact wrote on May 18, 2014, 20:09:Nope. My cable got slow and lost connection a few times within the last 45 minutes.Ant wrote on May 18, 2014, 18:59:It is stupid and unfortunate. However, if you enjoyed D1 and D2, the game is worth ignoring that problem -- assuming you have a stable internet connection.
Ah, bah to the online requirement especially for single player.![]()
Ant wrote on May 18, 2014, 18:59:It is stupid and unfortunate. However, if you enjoyed D1 and D2, the game is worth ignoring that problem -- assuming you have a stable internet connection.
Ah, bah to the online requirement especially for single player.![]()
Mr. Tact wrote on May 18, 2014, 18:57:Ah, bah to the online requirement especially for single player.Ant wrote on May 18, 2014, 18:49:I'd say other than the on-line requirement, it is as good as D1 and D2 since loot 2.0 and RoS. I waited almost two years to play the game, and it was worth the wait.
Is D3 better or good as D2 and D1? I didn't like its beta.![]()
Ant wrote on May 18, 2014, 18:49:I'd say other than the on-line requirement, it is as good as D1 and D2 since loot 2.0 and RoS. I waited almost two years to play the game, and it was worth the wait.
Is D3 better or good as D2 and D1? I didn't like its beta.![]()
Mr. Tact wrote on May 15, 2014, 16:59:Cram wrote on May 15, 2014, 16:43:Yeah, I know I could use the higher level gems on the low level characters, but I don't like to.
One quick note, you can use Marquise on your lvl 1 chars. There is no lvl requirement on gems anymore, so find a slotted weapon as quickly as possible and throw a red marquise or higher in it DPS+++ level on master diff or higher.
Edit: ah hell another point. I personally never store anything above flawless imperials in my stash, i always end up using them to reroll rings/amulets. I can't see the point in storing gems above flawless (especially of each color), if you're spending the money making royals and flawless royals you likely have an item you specifically want to put it in anyway.
It would still be nice if Blizzard introduced a "wallet" similar to what ANET did in Guild Wars 2 but include gems.Just a personal quirk.
You clearly have more gold in D3 than I do. On my "main" I have not yet gotten my gems for my chest and legs up to flawless royals. And even when I do, there are all my other characters. Let alone enough to make all the imperial flawless I would like to have for re-rolls.
Cram wrote on May 15, 2014, 16:43:Yeah, I know I could use the higher level gems on the low level characters, but I don't like to.
One quick note, you can use Marquise on your lvl 1 chars. There is no lvl requirement on gems anymore, so find a slotted weapon as quickly as possible and throw a red marquise or higher in it DPS+++ level on master diff or higher.
Edit: ah hell another point. I personally never store anything above flawless imperials in my stash, i always end up using them to reroll rings/amulets. I can't see the point in storing gems above flawless (especially of each color), if you're spending the money making royals and flawless royals you likely have an item you specifically want to put it in anyway.
It would still be nice if Blizzard introduced a "wallet" similar to what ANET did in Guild Wars 2 but include gems.
Mr. Tact wrote on May 15, 2014, 16:26:PHJF wrote on May 15, 2014, 15:32:And the five types above it, at least. That's 25 slots. Plus if you want to keep some of the pre-RoS ones when you build new characters..
Considering the only gems of any value are Marquise gems...? So that's, what, six slots in your stash?
Let me be a pack rat if I want to. Sell me tabs!![]()
PHJF wrote on May 15, 2014, 15:32:And the five types above it, at least. That's 25 slots. Plus if you want to keep some of the pre-RoS ones when you build new characters..
Considering the only gems of any value are Marquise gems...? So that's, what, six slots in your stash?
descender wrote on May 15, 2014, 11:47:I hope they do the same for gems. Crafting mats and gems take up almost an entire tab for me currently. And make gems auto pickup like gold does, even better -- make that a toggle setting in the options.
I'll give it some points there too, the stash is pretty annoying in D3 with 7,000 different unique crafting materials. Allegedly they are going to remove all crafting materials from the regular inventory in an upcoming patch though.
Mr. Tact wrote on May 15, 2014, 07:38:Slick wrote on May 14, 2014, 22:53:Looks like you are trolling to me, but you did get this right. They did fix it after nearly two years. I wanted D3 to be great, but until loot 2.0 it was merely okay -- not sufficient to motivate me past the silly on-line requirement. Now I've been playing since two weeks prior to RoS and it has been a blast.
so they fixed the game 2 years after release? TIME TO PARTY!
Yes, it gets somewhat repetitive in the "end game" -- but Diablo games have always been like this.