Prez wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 10:09:Same here
The best thing I can say about Uplay is that it doesn't piss me off much, so it's not a deal-breaker. I am excited about Watch Dogs enough to put up with the extra few seconds delay before the game launches via Steam and Uplay.
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Apr 9, 2014, 18:48:Don't kid yourself, Blizzard is doing it for the money too. When they only sell it digitally through their own platform they can 100% control the price. Notice how they rarely offer a digital sale?
Put simply, EA is doing it to be greedy; Blizzard is doing it for the games.
Beamer wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 16:36:The rewards vary. You can redeem the points for rewards, usually things on the line of pre-order goodies. Usually some are external to the game (like backgrounds for your desktop) and some are in game rewards (like an unlockable goody)
UPlay was easy to ignore with FC3 for me. I'd launch via Steam and it would launch. When I closed out, it would tell me I had some rewards or something, and I'd close it. I never looked into what those rewards meant or were.
Creston wrote on Apr 9, 2014, 12:43:Because Blizzard isn't singling out any digital distribution service - it simply includes a shared one with its games and doesn't allow other developers to use it. EA allows its games to be sold on various services but specifically boycotts Steam to benefit its bottom line. Put simply, EA is doing it to be greedy; Blizzard is doing it for the games.
How is Blizzard not putting their games on ANY digital platform somehow better than EA just not putting their games on Steam?
Creston wrote on Apr 9, 2014, 12:43:theyarecomingforyou wrote on Apr 9, 2014, 06:33:
Blizzard is different as it doesn't sell games through other stores (Steam, Origin, GMG, etc) and because it isn't done for anti-consumer reasons.
How is Blizzard not putting their games on ANY digital platform somehow better than EA just not putting their games on Steam?
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Apr 9, 2014, 06:33:
Blizzard is different as it doesn't sell games through other stores (Steam, Origin, GMG, etc) and because it isn't done for anti-consumer reasons.
Slick wrote on Apr 9, 2014, 01:13:I don't WANT to use UPlay, so I have no intention of buying it through UPlay. It is much more convenient for me to keep all my games in one place and Steam has the best overall service (profiles, achievements, events, trading, etc).
the solution to this isn't what people want to hear, but buy the game from their own publisher's service only. i'd buy the next Portal game from Steam, i'd buy Watch_Dogs from Uplay.
ColBlister wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 13:33:
The cool thing is that for games you buy on Steam that require Uplay, it doesn't matter which service you launch the game from, it will also launch the other service. Twice the waiting, twice the updates, twice the fun!
PHJF wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 18:27:I've gotten over bitching about them, they're here to stay and we already deal with plenty of em...
You deal with plenty of them. I'll keep not buying games I'd otherwise love to play because of such fucking arbitrarily intrusive and wholly unnecessary schemes.
PHJF wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 16:12:
No surprise there, another game I don't even have to ponder buying.
Unfortunately this practice isn't relegated solely to big publishers. I was about to jump on Age of Wonders 3 the other day until, imagine that, I find out it involves some dumbass fucking login.
Agent.X7 wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 12:50:
Uplay kind of sucks, but I will be getting this on PS4 so I don't care.
Prez wrote on Apr 8, 2014, 10:09:Ditto. I don't even have a problem with Origin, it's just that I can't buy EA games on Steam. The main service I've had issues with is GFWL, as that was a disaster - constant updates, corrupted saves, difficult to backup saves, etc. Rockstar Social Club is pretty fucking tedious too.
The best thing I can say about Uplay is that it doesn't piss me off much, so it's not a deal-breaker.