Facebook Acquires Oculus, Oculus Rift Minecraft Cancelled [Mar 25, 2014, 7:28 pm ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
Facebook has acquired Oculus, paying a reported $2 billion for the virtual
reality startup, which
Forbes says is $400 million in cash and 23.1 million shares of Facebook
stock, and the deal includes another potential $300 in incentives. "Mobile is
the platform of today, and now we’re also getting ready for the platforms of
tomorrow," Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement. "Oculus has the
chance to create the most social platform ever, and change the way we work, play
and communicate." There's some immediate fallout from this as
Markus "notch"
Persson tweets (thanks nin via
Joystiq) that this has ended the possibility of an Oculus version of Minecraft:
"We were in talks about maybe bringing a version of Minecraft to Oculus. I just
cancelled that deal. Facebook creeps me out."
Carmack is now working for Facebook shareholders. If that doesn't give you pause, I'm not sure what else to say.
Companies buy other ones for the people, yes, but also for the name and intellectual property. This enables them to sell the product to unwitting customers with the name or, failing that, they can prevent competitors from doing it through their trademarks. They maintain the physical talent but I find that the most creative people tend to be the least accepting of this corporate reality. They probably had good intentions with their visions (rather than "selling out") so that likely applies.
Facebook has had a rough patch the last few years. It's nothing new in nature or in companies (I personally liken companies to species in an ecology, evolved to mini-states of their own on the political scene). The old business life-cycle rears its ugly head, but applied to technology companies. They inevitably grow massive, stagnant, and focus more on R&D. R&D is about people and IP. It's about getting somewhere first.
So, that all being said, this is a natural step for a technology company that wishes to survive. The question is whether or not it was the right one - and obviously, that's where the shareholders come into play. People like the idea of VR, and the more knowledgable might even like Carmack, then let the accountants fill out the rest. Have no doubt about it, though, it was an idea sold based on speculation and it's hard to separate oversight from that with conventional corporate structures.
Companies buy other ones for the people, yes, but also for the name and intellectual property. This enables them to sell the product to unwitting customers with the name or, failing that, they can prevent competitors from doing it through their trademarks. They maintain the physical talent but I find that the most creative people tend to be the least accepting of this corporate reality. They probably had good intentions with their visions (rather than "selling out") so that likely applies.
Facebook has had a rough patch the last few years. It's nothing new in nature or in companies (I personally liken companies to species in an ecology, evolved to mini-states of their own on the political scene). The old business life-cycle rears its ugly head, but applied to technology companies. They inevitably grow massive, stagnant, and focus more on R&D. R&D is about people and IP. It's about getting somewhere first.
So, that all being said, this is a natural step for a technology company that wishes to survive. The question is whether or not it was the right one - and obviously, that's where the shareholders come into play. People like the idea of VR, and the more knowledgable might even like Carmack, then let the accountants fill out the rest. Have no doubt about it, though, it was an idea sold based on speculation and it's hard to separate oversight from that with conventional corporate structures.
Date
Subject
Author
29.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
5.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
9.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
14.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
26.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
116.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
16.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
27.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
48.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
50.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
30.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
31.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
33.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
38.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
45.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
101.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
55.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
115.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
117.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
58.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
66.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
157.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
158.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
137.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
111.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
68.
Mar 25, 2014Mar 25 2014
73.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
103.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
104.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
139.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
153.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
124.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
122.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
130.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
133.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
136.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
142.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
146.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
148.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
149.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
152.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
154.
Mar 26, 2014Mar 26 2014
173.
Mar 27, 2014Mar 27 2014
Copyright © 1996-2021 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2021 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 28 February 2021, 10:26.