Op Ed

The Atlantic - How the Video-Game Industry Already Lost Out in the Gun-Control Debate.
As it happens, that's just what happened to games (and popular media more generally) in the NRA's good guy with a gun response to the Newtown shooting. Guns aren't a factor in gun violence for the NRA—rather, games, media, and law enforcement failures must take the blame. Once the terms of the debate are set like this (and set they very much were thanks to the over-the-top bravado in this press conference) then it's very hard to extract oneself from the debate without shifting the frame, without changing the terms of the debate.

I certainly believe that the White House would like nothing more than to see an end to mass gun murders in America's elementary schools. But the fact remains that gun violence takes place every day, all across this country, at a rate of dozens of deaths a day, and as the leading cause of death among African-American youth. But when the vice president establishes a task force on gun control and violence that includes the media industries that the NRA has once again chosen as their patsies after a particularly heinous and public example of gun violence, all it can do is shift attention away from guns.

IGN - Let's Talk About Violent Video Games.
Distinctions between games for adults and those for kids are fairly clear these days, thanks to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB). Formed in 1994, the ESRB rates all video games as a guide for parents similar to the way movies are rated by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). Games are rated ranging from E for Everyone and T for Teen to M for Mature, 17+.

There is a fundamental misunderstanding that games are only for children. This needs to change for the 'violence in games' dialogue to advance.

View : : :
11.
 
Re: Op Ed
Jan 11, 2013, 11:52
11.
Re: Op Ed Jan 11, 2013, 11:52
Jan 11, 2013, 11:52
 
Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Jan 11, 2013, 11:21:
sauron wrote on Jan 11, 2013, 09:58:

In both the UK and Australia, strict gun controls were put in place following early occurrences of mass killings involving assault weapons. As a result, similar events have not occurred since. The US has not done the same, and so these horrible crimes keep happening.

Not true. In the UK mass killings happened again afterwords, and they also disarmed the police. And while the guy wandered around shooting people, it took them several hours to finally subdue him. Australia wasn't so much a part of the studies I did a few years back, but I do remember a heavy correlation after the loss of firearms a serious rise in violent crime and violent B&E a trend which is still rising.

Then again, anyone who uses the catch phrase "assault weapon" is probably just following the narrative. Being realistic, the media have more to blame than guns(an inanimate object) or the NRA. The media are willing to run with it, give it publicly, splash the person all over the place and give them recognition and infamy(in the other persons mind fame). Besides, if you're going to blame the NRA for anything, then you'd best blame the ACLU for anything free speech related.

And you might as well just piss all over that founding document while you're at it.

The liberal media is as usual looking for a scapegoat, guns are to blame being inanimate objects that require a person to actually pull the trigger, video games are to blame, everyone is to blame except the mentally unstable people that are actually doing these shootings.

The 2nd amendment is there for a reason. Looking back, who has committed murder in the largest degree? Dictators Adolf Hilter, Mao Tze Tung, Josef Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, etc.

Time and time again it has been a corrupt government who is responsible for the mass murder of their own people under the deceptive guise of “gun control,” all of which the said dictators implemented.

Keep in mind these people promised their citizens protection and freedom upon the forfeiture of their guns.

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Pol Pot, who created in Cambodia one of the 20th century’s most brutal and radical regimes, was responsible for killing one million of his own ‘educated,’ yet unarmed citizens

If you think this couldn't happen in the US you're an idiot, especially at the rate Obozo is going with all his executive orders when he doesn't get what he wants.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
2.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
8.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
10.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
   Re: Op Ed
14.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
    Re: Op Ed
16.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
     Re: Op Ed
18.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
25.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
19.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
21.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
26.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
        Re: Op Ed
35.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
42.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
48.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
           Re: Op Ed
50.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
            Re: Op Ed
57.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
             Re: Op Ed
62.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
             Re: Op Ed
53.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
           Re: Op Ed
55.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
           Re: Op Ed
56.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
            Re: Op Ed
59.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
             Re: Op Ed
61.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
              Re: Op Ed
63.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
              Re: Op Ed
64.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
               Re: Op Ed
66.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
                Re: Op Ed
65.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
               Re: Op Ed
83.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
               Re: Op Ed
84.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                Re: Op Ed
89.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                 Re: Op Ed
90.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                  Re: Op Ed
91.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                   Re: Op Ed
93.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                    Re: Op Ed
94.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                     Re: Op Ed
95.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                      Re: Op Ed
96.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                       Re: Op Ed
98.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                      Re: Op Ed
99.
Jan 13, 2013Jan 13 2013
                      Re: Op Ed
100.
Jan 13, 2013Jan 13 2013
                       Re: Op Ed
101.
Jan 13, 2013Jan 13 2013
                        Re: Op Ed
85.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
                Re: Op Ed
74.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
           Re: Op Ed
46.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
52.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
           Re: Op Ed
71.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
            Re: Op Ed
72.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
             Re: Op Ed
73.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
              Re: Op Ed
75.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
               Re: Op Ed
67.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
    Re: Op Ed
 11.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
   Re: Op Ed
12.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
    Re: Op Ed
13.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
    Re: Op Ed
15.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
     Re: Op Ed
17.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
20.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
22.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
        Re: Op Ed
23.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
24.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
31.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
30.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
        Re: Op Ed
34.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
41.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
43.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
44.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
        Re: Op Ed
47.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
54.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
58.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
           Re: Op Ed
45.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
51.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
        Re: Op Ed
69.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
78.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
86.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
           Re: Op Ed
76.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
         Re: Op Ed
77.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
81.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
          Re: Op Ed
87.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
          Re: Op Ed
88.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
           Re: Op Ed
49.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
27.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
     Re: Op Ed
28.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
29.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
33.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
      Re: Op Ed
36.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
       Re: Op Ed
3.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
4.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
6.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
7.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
   Re: Op Ed
5.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
9.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
32.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
38.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
40.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
37.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
39.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
60.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
68.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
70.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
79.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
80.
Jan 11, 2013Jan 11 2013
82.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
92.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013
97.
Jan 12, 2013Jan 12 2013