Op Ed

Gamasutra - The Burning of Star Wars: The Old Republic.
BioWare plainly went the wrong way with SWTOR. You don't have to go any further than the comments about how special and important subscribers are and how BioWare wants subscribers to feel special, even in the F2P environment. F2P is clearly just a demo; it's just that BioWare is changing the limit from "level cap 15" (the old trial, which also doesn't work) and instead applying every form of hindrance and impairment it can come up with, putting the Handicapper Generals to shame.

One has to question whether this makes any sense at all. The game was failing because people didn't want to pay for subscriptions. The choice was paying subscriptions or not playing at all, and people were choosing "not at all" over subs. How, then, does replacing "not at all" with "kneecapped" change things? How does that help net new subscribers, and how does that help keep existing subscribers?

Eurogamer.net - Are the rich old men ruining Kickstarter?
None of this has sat well with me. Maybe these rich old men can't afford to fund the development of their dream projects out of their own pocket - I don't know - but if they can't convince publishers and actual investors to fund them then I think they have to look at themselves and ask why, not look to us. Not to pick on Peter Molyneux, but I can think of plenty of reasons why no publisher or investor would bankroll one of his games without any kind of creative control, which is what £250k's worth of your money is currently promising to do.

To be fair, at least you can log in today. Perhaps the worst thing about this situation, however, is that it is confusing people about what Kickstarter actually represents. When I look at the names of these grandee developers, and I think back not just on the games they have produced but also the things they have said about them before release, my first reaction as a potential backer isn't to lick my lips at the concept artwork and drink in the product pitch - it's to consult the Kickstarter Terms of Use to see what recourse I might have if I end up disappointed for one reason or another.

View : : :
55.
 
Re: Op Ed
Dec 16, 2012, 06:22
55.
Re: Op Ed Dec 16, 2012, 06:22
Dec 16, 2012, 06:22
 
Prez wrote on Dec 15, 2012, 16:36:
I played the game for the free 30 days that came with the game (a friend bought me a key) without restriction and it was pretty terrible. There were hints of Knights of the Old Republic - enough to know that had Bioware made the game that most everyone actually wanted (KoTOR 3) instead of a half-assed WoW clone money grab it could have been awesome. It sucks massivley as a singleplayer game (which is all I was interested in it for) and if the server populations were any indication it isn't much better as an MMO. Despite it generally being considered a flop it probably made most - if not all- of its intitial investment back by now - best to cut their losses now and kill it because this turd is un-polishable.

No way. EA payed between 300 and 420 millions to make and market the game (some say there coming the difference cause they cant count total marketing...) AND 850 mil to buy shitty Bioware so all in all were talking abt 1.15 - 1.22 BILLION ! If they are not just laundering money they failed miserably
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
2.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
3.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
5.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
8.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
15.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
   Re: Op Ed
27.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
    Re: Op Ed
6.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
9.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
13.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
   Re: Op Ed
14.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
    Re: Op Ed
59.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
   Re: Op Ed
12.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
19.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
26.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
4.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
11.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
16.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
17.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
18.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
   Re: Op Ed
22.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
    Re: Op Ed
23.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
     Re: Op Ed
 55.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
    Re: Op Ed
56.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
     Re: Op Ed
57.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
     Re: Op Ed
7.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
10.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
20.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
21.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
24.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
45.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
   Re: Op Ed
58.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
60.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
61.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
   Re: Op Ed
62.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
    Re: Op Ed
63.
Dec 17, 2012Dec 17 2012
     Re: Op Ed
25.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
29.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
28.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
30.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
31.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
43.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
32.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
33.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
34.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
35.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
36.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
37.
Dec 15, 2012Dec 15 2012
   Re: Op Ed
40.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
42.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
   Re: Op Ed
38.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
39.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
41.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
44.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
46.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
47.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
48.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
49.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
50.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
51.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
52.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
53.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
54.
Dec 16, 2012Dec 16 2012
64.
Dec 17, 2012Dec 17 2012