HorrorScope wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 20:58:
We've all been there and it does suck, so we feel for you.
If you don't mind:
Why would you worry about a ghost image vs clean? It's an exact copy of a working system, all one's and zero's and you have an option to copy sectors if you want an exact image how it's laid out. This is a very standard, mature method.
You can have different saves, one could be a clean load with just the updates complete and basic core software you always want installed period. I do that anytime I get a new pc up. In that case it's a 45 min recovery and you are in a great clean state, save hours.
Or save your system state weekly and keep 2 copies just in case. With computers for me it's one moment everything is good and the next moment something went to hell badly, typically a hard drive crash. Now in 45 minutes you can be restored almost back to exactly where you were at, saving tons of hours and things you would forget about. This is better then cooking with gas.
I've done it, the company I worked for that is how they deploy units, I didn't know there was a downside to be honest.
You probably know all of this, but I like to put it out there regularly because that to me is how to backup for any user.
Good to hear the NVidia forums are back up, they were down for a looooong time.
PropheT wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 22:04:Muscular Beaver wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 17:43:
Anyone tried it yet what that means exactly? More or less power usage?
Basically, it means the power handling and clocking of the card is handled closer to what the old "Prefer Maximum Performance" power-state setting that the control panel offered. It does increase power usage slightly but not significantly from what I've found, and it helps with stuttering and some other issues that the power-save feature caused in certain games.
Muscular Beaver wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 17:43:
Anyone tried it yet what that means exactly? More or less power usage?
Respen wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 19:38:
Horror,
I'm actually active in the Nvidia forums on this topic as well, lol. Several others with the issue but less solutions than here. I am very anal about my installs, im more likely to reformat than use a ghost image, if im going to start over id rather go all the way, I appreciate all of the advice though. Trying the step by step when I get home from work. I'm used to tweaking and hunting for solutions... but this particularly annoys me because I was under the impression it was a whql release...
Hate putting all of these writes and rewrites on my ssd. Anyway, back to work for a few I'm a horrible phone typist anyhow.
Shok wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:29:shihonage wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:20:
NVidia drivers under Win8 may be experiencing a similar problem to what's happening under WinXP.
Here's something that may work for you (the only thing that worked under XP for me, and I tried everything from safe mode to manual driver installs):
1) start normal nvidia install
2) at about 80% of the install, go to task manager and end process tree for nvidia setup stuff
3) reboot
It really works... at least on XP. There's some bug in the installer that uninstalls the driver at the very end, so stopping it beforehand works.
No, just no. That is some of the worst advice you could give someone. You don't go pulling the rug out from under an installer while it is updating device drivers. See comment 31 from Soulburner, that is the best solution here:Soulburner wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 16:02:
To anyone that has problems with the installer failing - you have to:
1. uninstall the current drivers and reboot
2. extract the drivers installer with Winrar or 7zip
3. open Device Manager and find your graphics card. Double click it and select the "update driver" button, then point it to the extracted files
4. The system will install the driver only - reboot just in case
5. NOW, run the installer normally. It will complete without failing.
It's weird. Earlier, I've tried only uninstalling the drivers and running DriverSweeper, but that did not help.
Respen wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:54:HorrorScope wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:38:Creston wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 15:14:Respen wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 15:08:
Well, thanks for the heads up eRe4s3r. You were right, something must be wrong with my installer. Most items failed or partially installed, including PhysX now.
Sonofab*tch. There goes my next day off.
Just do a system restore to yesterday.
Creston
Exactly, at the very worst.
Except it didnt work, as you would know if you'd read the next few posts. A solution was posted though... can't wait to get home and give it a try.
HorrorScope wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:38:Creston wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 15:14:Respen wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 15:08:
Well, thanks for the heads up eRe4s3r. You were right, something must be wrong with my installer. Most items failed or partially installed, including PhysX now.
Sonofab*tch. There goes my next day off.
Just do a system restore to yesterday.
Creston
Exactly, at the very worst.
Creston wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 15:14:Respen wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 15:08:
Well, thanks for the heads up eRe4s3r. You were right, something must be wrong with my installer. Most items failed or partially installed, including PhysX now.
Sonofab*tch. There goes my next day off.
Just do a system restore to yesterday.
Creston
eRe4s3r wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 14:50:
It's a rare but common enough problem, only solution? Reinstall the OS.. I am not joking on that. No driver will ever install for you these 3 items if they failed once. I had the same issue on Vista and since I upgraded to W7 it's gone. So maybe it's an OS related issue with the drivers, but all r300 drivers from nvidia did that for me.
eRe4s3r wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:02:Look on the brightside, now you have a shiny new OS install to break for the future.
Yeah I read the solution below/above whateverSomeone should have told me about that a month ago
![]()
shihonage wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 18:20:
NVidia drivers under Win8 may be experiencing a similar problem to what's happening under WinXP.
Here's something that may work for you (the only thing that worked under XP for me, and I tried everything from safe mode to manual driver installs):
1) start normal nvidia install
2) at about 80% of the install, go to task manager and end process tree for nvidia setup stuff
3) reboot
It really works... at least on XP. There's some bug in the installer that uninstalls the driver at the very end, so stopping it beforehand works.
Soulburner wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 16:02:
To anyone that has problems with the installer failing - you have to:
1. uninstall the current drivers and reboot
2. extract the drivers installer with Winrar or 7zip
3. open Device Manager and find your graphics card. Double click it and select the "update driver" button, then point it to the extracted files
4. The system will install the driver only - reboot just in case
5. NOW, run the installer normally. It will complete without failing.
It's weird. Earlier, I've tried only uninstalling the drivers and running DriverSweeper, but that did not help.
Mashiki Amiketo wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 17:14:eRe4s3r wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 14:50:There's solutions posted earlier in the thread, but I'm just going to say it's overkill. The only time you should need to nuke an OS install from orbit is when it's so screwed up, that you can't fix it. This though, is fixable with enough patience.
It's a rare but common enough problem, only solution? Reinstall the OS.. I am not joking on that.
Muscular Beaver wrote on Dec 4, 2012, 17:43:That's what it's supposed to be. I'm going to stay away from them and stick to the 306's. The last time they tried this it was nearly 7 months of driver restart crashes, because of their "power saving feature." Most will probably remember the 279-299 series drivers that gave the "driver has stopped responding" messages. They were trying something similar as well.
Anyone tried it yet what that means exactly? More or less power usage?