Verno wrote on Nov 14, 2012, 13:23:Porn-O-Matic wrote on Nov 14, 2012, 13:10:theyarecomingforyou wrote on Nov 14, 2012, 12:02:
Just as I feared, the graphics look terrible. They really should have waited for the next-gen consoles, as they could have still released X360/PS3 versions with shitty graphics. The trailer doesn't give us any idea of what the gameplay is like, which is a concern after GTAIV. And the lack of a PC version puts this firmly in the "don't give a shit" category.
Graphics look terrible?? Compared to WHAT? Holy fucking shit, nothing but a bunch of goddamned crybaby whiners who think console games are supposed to have better-than-life graphics. Compared to GTA 4, it looks like GTA 5 is a whole world better and I'm STILL amazed by all the detail in GTA 4, which I play almost every fucking day right NOW. Take a fucking reality pill already.
Any random game or do they have to be in the same genre? I can think of about 20 games with better visuals but it's hard to really compare and contrast. GTA4 had a great physics engine but I'd say that's about where the PC port stopped being good.
That said, I agree the graphics don't look "terrible" as others said but I'd rather get the game on the PC later on so modders can work on it and maybe we can get some better AA going on (jaggies like crazy there).
It was certainly a well done trailer but it's a cinematic trailer, not real gameplay. I'm more anxious to see if they have revisited their awful cover implementation and general control schemes.No idea what you're talking about. I play GTA 4 on the PC, GTX470, and my MSI Afterburner is most definitely showing 100% GPU use with most graphics details in-game cranked to the max and I get 50+ fps in most areas of the city at 1920x1080. No graphics mods.
It's been a long time since I played GTAIV but I remember it being a heavily CPU bound game that was very light on GPUs, benchmarks seemed to complain about that too.