Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

Follow-up to this. - Lost Humanity 18 Aftermath.
The first is that a lot of people want to know more about why I made the changes and issued an apology. The answer is that Lauren Wainwright threatened us with legal action and made it clear she would not back down, at which point we took legal advice and ultimately made the decision to remove the paragraphs. It was not a decision that I took lightly. One objection to this action that I've read online is that there was no libel. All I can really say is that the advice we received meant that removing the offending text and apologising to Lauren was the right course of action to take. We also considered the fact that the article wasn't really about her but about all of us, and I felt that the edited version did not change Rab's meaning.

The second main reaction seems to have come mostly from people who work in the games industry - it's all over my Twitter feed, anyway - and it's that a lot of people want to forget about the whole thing and move on. It's just video games, they say. It's not as important as all this. Well, I don't want to move on. It is important. And I don't want to move on for the same reasons I published Rab's column in the first place: I believe there is a lot of truth in what he says.

23. Re: Out of the Blue Nov 1, 2012, 18:00 Flatline
Golwar wrote on Nov 1, 2012, 07:47:
I don't get why people always must hate someone. Last time pretty much everyone here hated Eurogamer, considering them to have betrayed Rab. This time Lauren is the target.

Sorry, but it is sickening when the reaction of unaffected third persons is so much harsher than of those affected. Rab himself wrote the first time that he wasn't mad with EG and yet people ignored it.

Here he wrote about his impressions in all details:

So do you think that he considers Lauren to be evil? No? So why do YOU?
She was naive, panicked and probably got some ill advise. She was without a doubt dumb, but that's it. Don't pretend that you never were.

I don't think she's evil by any stretch of the imagination. And if she had just done the C&D legal threat and that was the end of it, yeah, I'd have agreed she was stupid.

But she kept. feeding. the fire. to cover up her own actions. How many "coincidences" do you have to see that rely on one another before it starts being a little hard to swallow? She didn't just make one bad decision, she doubled down on the bad decisions like six or seven different times, and as a public figure (which she strove to be), she brought all the hateraid down on herself.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Oct 31, 19:09 Re: Op Ed Cutter
  2. Oct 31, 19:23  Re: Op Ed ASeven
  3. Oct 31, 19:40   Re: Op Ed nin
  4. Oct 31, 20:09    Re: Op Ed Prez
  5. Oct 31, 21:10     Re: Op Ed Dades
  10. Nov 1, 00:23     Re: Op Ed Flatline
  11. Nov 1, 00:55      Re: Op Ed Draugr
  12. Nov 1, 07:13       Re: Out of the Blue Rigs
  13. Nov 1, 07:32        Re: Out of the Blue Dades
  14. Nov 1, 07:47        Re: Out of the Blue Golwar
  16. Nov 1, 09:09         Re: Out of the Blue Verno
  17. Nov 1, 09:24         Re: Out of the Blue nin
  18. Nov 1, 09:34          Re: Out of the Blue Beamer
  19. Nov 1, 09:42          Re: Out of the Blue Verno
  21. Nov 1, 10:25          Re: Out of the Blue Parallax Abstraction
  20. Nov 1, 10:01         Re: Out of the Blue Bhruic
>> 23. Nov 1, 18:00         Re: Out of the Blue Flatline
  15. Nov 1, 09:03        Re: Out of the Blue Bhruic
  22. Nov 1, 17:57       Re: Op Ed Flatline
  6. Oct 31, 22:53 Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  7. Oct 31, 23:05  Re: Op Ed Quboid
  8. Oct 31, 23:23   Re: Op Ed theyarecomingforyou
  9. Oct 31, 23:44    Re: Op Ed PropheT
  24. Nov 2, 08:32 Re: Op Ed strong placebo


Blue's News logo