Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

DSOGaming - Eurogamer amends Robert Florence’s article about Geoff Keighley after threat of legal action. Thanks Joao. - Lost Humanity 18- A Table of Doritos.
Standards are important. They are hard to live up to, sure, but that's the point of them. The trouble with games journalism is that there are no standards. We expect to see Geoff Keighley sitting beside a table of s***. We expect to see the flurry of excitement when the GMAs get announced, instead of a chuckle and a roll of the eyes. We expect to see our games journos failing to get what journalistic integrity means. The brilliant writers, like John Walker for example, don't get the credit they deserve simply because they don't play the game. Indeed, John Walker gets told to get off his pedestal because he has high standards and is pointing out a worrying problem.

Forbes - Video Game Journalist Robert Florence Leaves Eurogamer After Libel Complaints.
Where does journalism end and unwitting advertising begin? I actually ask myself this question a lot, because a lot of the time I write very positive and hopeful things about gaming – because I love video games, and deep down I obviously want as many of them to succeed as possible.

These are hard questions and they don’t have simple answers, but they’re important questions to ask.

John Walker's Electronic House - An Utter Disgrace.
And what the above proves is not only just how moronic UK libel laws are, where someone can’t directly quote a person and then point out possible misinterpretations that could arise from it, but also how deftly our broken system can be used to silence not only discussion, but also criticism.

When a journalist feels they have been misrepresented, even if this so-called misrepresentation has arisen from their having been directly quoted, the response should not be to demand it be removed. The response is to offer to write a response column, or to publish a response in any of the public outlets to which they have access. To do anything else is to be an enemy of journalism, deliberately stifling discussion, and going out of one’s way to ensure further discussion is feared.

30. Re: Op Ed Oct 26, 2012, 11:42 Beamer
Yakubs wrote on Oct 26, 2012, 11:23:
Game reviewers will never have a positive image. It's simply impossible until intelligent, educated people become game reviewers, which will never happen until games are widely considered to be artistic equivalents to things like books, music, and movies. Right now, only people with low standards become game reviewers because they're the only ones willing to play the latest AAA shlock 8 hours a day for $30k a year.

Most game reviewers are both intelligent and, specifically, educated.

The problem isn't the people, it's the system. Game review companies are supported exclusively by game production companies. And there's really no way to change that.

Solution: be as critical about reading reviews as you are about playing games. Don't look at numbers, find a substantial review and read what the person liked and disliked. If you know what you like and dislike you'll be able to make a perfectly educated purchase.
Music for the discerning:
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Oct 25, 20:50 Re: Op Ed Cutter
  2. Oct 25, 21:19  Re: Op Ed TheLeech
  3. Oct 25, 21:26   Re: Op Ed ASeven
  20. Oct 26, 08:46   Re: Op Ed Cutter
  8. Oct 25, 22:40  Re: Op Ed finga
  9. Oct 25, 23:54   Re: Op Ed Asmo
  10. Oct 26, 00:42    Re: Op Ed Flatline
  11. Oct 26, 02:02     Re: Op Ed Prez
  13. Oct 26, 08:10      Re: Op Ed Golwar
  18. Oct 26, 08:23      Re: Op Ed Creston
  14. Oct 26, 08:11  Re: Op Ed Creston
  4. Oct 25, 21:42 Re: Op Ed Tumbler
  5. Oct 25, 21:48 Re: Op Ed Jivaro
  6. Oct 25, 22:05  Re: Op Ed Dev
  7. Oct 25, 22:08  Re: Op Ed PHJF
  16. Oct 26, 08:16  Re: Op Ed Creston
  12. Oct 26, 07:51 Re: Op Ed avianflu
  15. Oct 26, 08:12  Re: Op Ed Golwar
  17. Oct 26, 08:18   Re: Op Ed Creston
  19. Oct 26, 08:41    Re: Op Ed Golwar
  21. Oct 26, 08:46     Re: Op Ed Creston
  22. Oct 26, 09:07      Re: Op Ed Golwar
  24. Oct 26, 09:32       Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  34. Oct 26, 13:44       Re: Op Ed Creston
  23. Oct 26, 09:17 Re: Op Ed Verno
  25. Oct 26, 09:42  Re: Op Ed PHJF
  26. Oct 26, 09:57   Re: Op Ed InBlack
  27. Oct 26, 10:02 Re: Op Ed ASeven
  28. Oct 26, 10:25 Re: Op Ed avianflu
  29. Oct 26, 11:23 Re: Op Ed Yakubs
>> 30. Oct 26, 11:42  Re: Op Ed Beamer
  31. Oct 26, 12:12   Re: Op Ed ASeven
  35. Oct 26, 13:52    Re: Op Ed nin
  36. Oct 26, 13:53    Re: Op Ed Creston
  37. Oct 26, 14:47     Re: Op Ed ASeven
  32. Oct 26, 12:28 Re: Op Ed Verno
  33. Oct 26, 12:34  Re: Op Ed ASeven
  38. Oct 26, 16:17 Re: Op Ed ASeven
  39. Oct 26, 18:59  Re: Op Ed Flatline


Blue's News logo