Blizzard "Looking At" F2P StarCraft II Multiplayer

Blizzard is "looking at free to play as an option for the multiplayer" in StarCraft II, reports StarcraftN, quoting lead designer Dustin Browder during a panel discussion at the Valencia eSports Congress. He also notes that the nature of their RTS sequel may not make this worthwhile. "We don’t know how we would monetize it," he adds. "While it might be good fun for me to play against someone with only half the units available to them, that’s not going to be an enjoyable experience for them." Thanks Eurogamer.
View : : :
19.
 
Re: Blizzard
Sep 21, 2012, 23:52
19.
Re: Blizzard Sep 21, 2012, 23:52
Sep 21, 2012, 23:52
 
007Bistromath wrote on Sep 21, 2012, 23:32:
TheEmissary wrote on Sep 21, 2012, 21:24:
As far as people bitching about them worrying about how they would monetize it, what the fuck do you expect? No one would do F2P if they couldn't make money off of it. Even Valve makes boatloads of cash off of their F2P model. If you're expecting developers to just hand you shit with no way for them to make money, you're either stupid or naive. Seriously, your complaints aren't even making sense anymore, just go fuck yourselves.

NO U

They are taking an existing product and screwing it up. I don't play SC2, and wouldn't if they paid me, but I know when something is Fd in the A zone. With successful F2P schemes, a game is either built from the ground up to be playable as an a la carte experience, or the parts you buy are things that don't change the core gameplay. If they wanted to sell maps on a microtransaction basis, that'd be fine. Even small efficiency tweaks would be a sensible way of doing this, because people just go apeshit for advancement mechanics of any kind, and the existing competitive scene could continue to exist at the end of that silly little metagame.

Their best idea, which they admit is stupid, is "give people a broken version of our game."

That's not even how you make a good demo, in the traditional scheme. It makes even less sense in the new model. It is full retard, and even talking about it shows that they're putting zero thought or effort into this.

Having a F2P game that is actually just a portion of your hard drive that says "buy the real thing and this won't suck anymore" is not magnanimous. They sold their game to just about everyone who actually wants it. They got paid. If they want to convert less interested people into sales, this crap is not how to do it.

I was talking about F2P in general, not this situation in particular, but if Blizzard can find a way to make SC2 F2P without screwing over those of us that paid $60 already, then more power to them.
Avatar 13977
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
16.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
3.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
5.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
7.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
9.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
10.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
11.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
12.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
13.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
     Re: Blizzard
14.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
      Re: Blizzard
15.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
       Re: Blizzard
27.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
        Re: Blizzard
28.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
         Re: Blizzard
17.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
       Re: Blizzard
20.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
        Re: Blizzard
21.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
         Re: Blizzard
18.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
 19.
Sep 21, 2012Sep 21 2012
   Re: Blizzard
22.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
26.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
24.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
30.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
25.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
29.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
31.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
33.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
32.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
34.
Sep 22, 2012Sep 22 2012
35.
Sep 24, 2012Sep 24 2012