25 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
 |
| 25. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 23:23 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Beamer wrote on Sep 5, 2012, 23:07:
Sepharo wrote on Sep 5, 2012, 21:07:
Does your comment have anything to do with what you quoted? Or is it just like those of professional spammers...
"Interesting game. You should check out these interesting shoes at ubuynow.com for $35."
Yeah, it was a pretty non-partisan post he went off on, damning both sides and showing favoritism to neither. It said the Dems sucked but gave credit to the Republicans for trying less hard to hide their equal suck.
If that's the type of post you consider non partisan, I don't know what to tell you. That's like saying Democrats are honest and don't really race bait/play the race card to try and keep a voting base. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 24. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 23:07 |
Beamer |
|
|
Sepharo wrote on Sep 5, 2012, 21:07:
Does your comment have anything to do with what you quoted? Or is it just like those of professional spammers...
"Interesting game. You should check out these interesting shoes at ubuynow.com for $35."
Yeah, it was a pretty non-partisan post he went off on, damning both sides and showing favoritism to neither. It said the Dems sucked but gave credit to the Republicans for trying less hard to hide their equal suck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 23. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 21:07 |
Sepharo |
|
|
Does your comment have anything to do with what you quoted? Or is it just like those of professional spammers...
"Interesting game. You should check out these interesting shoes at ubuynow.com for $35." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 22. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 15:01 |
RollinThundr |
|
|
Bodolza wrote on Sep 5, 2012, 13:15:
I've got to give credit to the Republicans this time. At least they aren't pretending they want an open internet. Their party platform just says outright that they don't care about protecting openness, except for what's in their own self-interest.
Interesting, and here I thought it was conservatives who push for smaller government and less government intrusion, where as liberals want bigger government, more oversight and more gub'ment handouts. Oh wait you only think that way if you don't feed into the massive bullshit the majority liberal media feeds you.
So how's that hopey changy socialist utopia working out so far? Good? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 21. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 13:15 |
Bodolza |
|
|
| I've got to give credit to the Republicans this time. At least they aren't pretending they want an open internet. Their party platform just says outright that they don't care about protecting openness, except for what's in their own self-interest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 20. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 12:00 |
Creston |
|
|
Both political parties support an open internet. Sure they do. That's what Obama said in 2008 too, and how well has his lapdog Genachowski done in that regard?
And while they both support an open internet, the DoD keeps randomly shutting down websites with no explanation or recourse for the owners of said websites.
Just more political bullshit lies. The only thing both parties are interested in is internet taxation.
Creston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 19. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 11:49 |
eRe4s3r |
|
|
| Why would you expect the internet to change people? If anything it just gives those people more exposure, not better exposure, just more of it. And the "personalization bubble" that many news (especially google) employ prevents that anyone looks ever past their horizon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 18. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 09:26 |
Beamer |
|
|
Frags4Fun wrote on Sep 4, 2012, 23:37:
Every time there is an election coming up, we hear all these liars telling us what we want to hear. After they get elected, they completely forget what they said.
Well, they're not lying, they're not giving you the truth.
They want freedom on the internet. Your question should be "freedom from what?" or even "freedom for who?" Typically it's something along the lines of "freedom from anonymous bullying or cowardice" or something that's the opposite of what most people view as freedom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 17. |
removed |
Sep 5, 2012, 09:24 |
space captain |
|
|
* REMOVED *
This comment was deleted on Sep 5, 2012, 12:29. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 16. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 09:22 |
LiTh |
|
|
"I do not take a single newspaper, nor read one a month, and I feel myself infinitely the happier for it." - Thomas Jefferson
Older i get, more this applies...then i start thinking its me thats the masocist for even being curious and wanting to see whats going on in the world... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 15. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 07:28 |
nin |
|
|
Longswd wrote on Sep 5, 2012, 00:11:
Giant douche or turd sandwich, take yer pick. Both are bought and paid for pieces of corrupt shit.
See, that's what frustrates me about politics. In the spring there's all kinds of options, and I think "maybe, just MAYBE, things will be different this time?!"
And then by the fall we're back to the same old "pick whichever you think is the lesser of two evils"...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 07:09 |
MUGWUMP |
|
|
I'm not even really talking about the politicians now. The media has got me pissed off feeding shit back and forth.
I may have been too drunk/young to pay attention in the past. I insist that it's hit an all time high, but really old (I'm just GETTING old  people tell me nothing has changed.
The internet is supposed to change that, but 90% of people just gravitate to one side or the other. Then the hateful stuff starts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 06:37 |
eRe4s3r |
|
|
| Ask yourself who makes laws and then you will know why The system is designed to be corrupt. Even way back, in earliest time, politicians made promises to get elected that they didn't really feel like keeping. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 06:17 |
MUGWUMP |
|
|
How about the media as well?
Blatant lies from both sides. It makes me sick that 90% of the population here probably believes every story.
Can "we the people" file a class action lawsuit against our government? I want a full audit. Maybe the media as well?
It makes me sick how these politicians run around spending hundreds of millions of dollars on campaigns while there's people struggling/failing to pay their bills. I understand they have to do it, but it doesn't make me any less frustrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 01:19 |
rist3903 |
|
|
I still have on the front of my fridge from the last time around:
Dare to hope. Prepare to be disappointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 01:11 |
Cutter |
|
|
Imagine if politicians/political parties could be held accountable and charged for fraud like everyone else who lies, cheats, and steals like they do? I've never understood why things like fraud/bait and switch don't apply to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Hey! Nobody calls Moe St. Cool a phony!" |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 5, 2012, 00:11 |
Longswd |
|
|
Giant douche or turd sandwich, take yer pick. Both are bought and paid for pieces of corrupt shit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I don't always drink carbonated Mexican rat piss, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 4, 2012, 23:51 |
Ant |
|
|
nin wrote on Sep 4, 2012, 23:46:
Frags4Fun wrote on Sep 4, 2012, 23:37:
Every time there is an election coming up, we hear all these liars telling us what we want to hear. After they get elected, they completely forget what they said.
No kidding. We get one year of promises, and another 3 years of ignoring them...
Yep, they suck. Why bother? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 4, 2012, 23:46 |
nin |
|
|
Frags4Fun wrote on Sep 4, 2012, 23:37:
Every time there is an election coming up, we hear all these liars telling us what we want to hear. After they get elected, they completely forget what they said.
No kidding. We get one year of promises, and another 3 years of ignoring them...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: Evening Legal Briefs |
Sep 4, 2012, 23:37 |
Frags4Fun |
|
|
| Every time there is an election coming up, we hear all these liars telling us what we want to hear. After they get elected, they completely forget what they said. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987 |
|
|
|
|
| |
25 Replies. 2 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 2 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
