Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Morning Legal Briefs

29. Re: Morning Legal Briefs Aug 9, 2012, 20:19 Veterator
Beamer wrote on Aug 9, 2012, 17:33:
Veterator wrote on Aug 9, 2012, 15:36:
Most CEOs in the US are douches, when are they going to bust in their doors and beat em up some while they seize their assets and holdings? Or the bankers.......

Has to be easier to bust them for douchebaggery and illegal practices when they are in the same country as the people pushing for it.

Dotcom needs to beef up on his white collar crime if he wants to run with the big dogs.

Most CEOs and bankers don't do anything illegal. Hell, most CEOs and bankers don't do anything shady. They're jerks, but doing everything 100% within the law.

Which is why the laws may be an issue, but tell that to RollinThunder.

Even most traders, which is probably what you mean when you say "bankers," don't do anything particularly bad, but it's their culture that's really screwing everything up (and, at this point, I think most people will never understand the difference between an investment banker and a trader. I'm always surprised the media doesn't actually use proper terms. Traders are not bankers, they're greedy monkeys with terminals.)

Similar boat in my mind.

Dotcom may or may not have been profiting directly from copyright infringement. They threw the law out the window instead of building a proper case and went after him.

CEOs/whoever may be in charge of companies may or may not be breaking employment laws by requiring Facebook logins and other information on people that is in direct violation to protected classes and other criteria they aren't allowed to ask about. Divorced, have kids, planning to have kids, gay, straight, member of whatever political group, etc.

Hell companies doing 5 year long wage freezes despite posting a lot of profits to me seems like another questionable thing they should be investigating. Not temporary wage freezes, minimum period wage freezes. Caterpillar was going for 6 year wage freezes.

Bankers/traders/lenders/mortgage handlers. I frankly can't tell where the housing crisis began or ended in that group of people. It seemed like everyone hand their hand in the jar and fueled the frenzy despite all indicators and basic common sense. Kept telling people everything was great and kept on lending. Then after it busted, which they had a large hand in, they had many instances of illegal foreclosures. They broke into a guy's home and "winterized" after he just bought it.

Hell on another forum was reading about a guy who was unable to buy a house because the bank who was trying to short sale it was operating in bad faith and wasn't disclosing the existence of liens on the property. Trying to handle them by delaying the process and kept silent until they couldn't hide it any longer.

I mean .....this stuff is right up to the line of fraud if not outright fraud. Why aren't they being busted? They are in the US doing this stuff. They are hurting real people's funds and homes, not imaginary copyright infringement bucks. Yet the imaginary funds gets the assault squads..and can't even seal the deal because they borked it.

The obvious answer is that busting corporations and their employees doesn't aid corporations. And when it comes between corporations, the one with the deepest pockets gets to choose what happens to the less influential companies. I always like to ask myself, would an individual doing this to another individual be in jail? If the answer is probably yes, then the law should be applied the same to corporations. If the answer is no, then the corporation is probably as close to "good" as it can be considering how favorable the laws are toward them versus the individual.

Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Aug 9, 10:46 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Creston
  3. Aug 9, 11:17  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NegaDeath
  7. Aug 9, 12:18   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Cutter
  26. Aug 9, 17:37    Re: Morning Legal Briefs Dmitri_M
  2. Aug 9, 11:16 Dot Com pwns the USA eRe4s3r
  4. Aug 9, 11:53  Re: Dot Com pwns the USA ASeven
  5. Aug 9, 12:07   Re: Dot Com pwns the USA eRe4s3r
  6. Aug 9, 12:18    Re: Dot Com pwns the USA ASeven
  9. Aug 9, 12:43     Re: Dot Com pwns the USA eRe4s3r
  24. Aug 9, 16:11      Re: Dot Com pwns the USA jdreyer
  32. Aug 9, 22:38       Re: Dot Com pwns the USA eRe4s3r
  33. Aug 9, 23:35        Re: Dot Com pwns the USA RailWizard
  36. Aug 10, 07:30         Re: Dot Com pwns the USA eRe4s3r
  17. Aug 9, 14:52   Re: Dot Com pwns the USA Mashiki Amiketo
  8. Aug 9, 12:43 Re: Morning Legal Briefs avianflu
  10. Aug 9, 12:49 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Verno
  11. Aug 9, 13:00  Re: Morning Legal Briefs ASeven
  12. Aug 9, 13:01  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Creston
  13. Aug 9, 13:20   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Verno
  14. Aug 9, 13:44    Re: Morning Legal Briefs ASeven
  15. Aug 9, 14:01 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Verno
  16. Aug 9, 14:04  Re: Morning Legal Briefs ASeven
  18. Aug 9, 15:01  Re: Morning Legal Briefs NegaDeath
  19. Aug 9, 15:06   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Verno
  20. Aug 9, 15:28    Re: Morning Legal Briefs NegaDeath
  21. Aug 9, 15:28    Re: Morning Legal Briefs Cutter
  22. Aug 9, 15:32     Re: Morning Legal Briefs NegaDeath
  23. Aug 9, 15:36 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Veterator
  25. Aug 9, 17:33  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Beamer
>> 29. Aug 9, 20:19   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Veterator
  40. Aug 10, 10:44  Re: Morning Legal Briefs RollinThundr
  27. Aug 9, 18:52 Re: Morning Legal Briefs RailWizard
  28. Aug 9, 19:52  Re: Morning Legal Briefs Julio
  30. Aug 9, 21:26   Re: Morning Legal Briefs RailWizard
  31. Aug 9, 22:07    Re: Morning Legal Briefs Beamer
  39. Aug 10, 09:16     Re: Morning Legal Briefs Veterator
  35. Aug 10, 05:50    Re: Morning Legal Briefs Julio
  37. Aug 10, 07:55    Re: Morning Legal Briefs eRe4s3r
  38. Aug 10, 09:14     Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sepharo
  41. Aug 10, 10:50      Re: Morning Legal Briefs RollinThundr
  42. Aug 10, 10:58      Re: Morning Legal Briefs RailWizard
  43. Aug 10, 11:53       Re: Morning Legal Briefs RollinThundr
  34. Aug 10, 03:10 Re: Morning Legal Briefs KilrathiAce
  44. Aug 10, 15:17 Re: Morning Legal Briefs Sepharo
  45. Aug 10, 16:12  Re: Morning Legal Briefs RollinThundr
  46. Aug 11, 00:55   Re: Morning Legal Briefs Dades
  47. Aug 11, 18:42    Re: Morning Legal Briefs RollinThundr


Blue's News logo