Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Out of the Blue

Yeah, yesterday was pretty darned hot, and today is shaping up to be more of the same. I have to say, I remain amazed at how livable our house is with only the one air conditioner here in the attic. Just a benefit of a house built before AC even existed, when finding ways to naturally abate the heat were vital.

Vital Links: Thanks Ant and Acleacius.
Play: Ragdoll Achievement.
Links: Video Games: An Industry in Flux [INFOGRAPHIC].
Stories: Las Vegas roulette wheel reportedly hits 19 seven straight times.
Media: 8-Bitham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.
The "Pre-Mortem One-Liner" Supercut. NSFW.
Top Gear Record Breaking Stunt.
Follow-up: Professor fired after expressing climate change skepticism.
Where the Hell is Matt? Dancing All Over the World AGAIN!

26. Re: Out of the Blue Jun 22, 2012, 22:05 Mashiki Amiketo
jdreyer wrote on Jun 22, 2012, 05:38:

Why do conservatives have such a problem with science? Of 1000s of studies, published 99% support anthropomorphic global warming. 1% don't. You guys really do support the 1%. Please go buy beachfront property in FL and let us know how that works out for you in 30 years.

Put it another way: would you not fire a doctor who tried to fix you using leeches and prayer instead of modern surgical techniques? 99% of published studies show that modern surgical techniques are more effective than leeches and prayer. Are you really going to say you shouldn't fire the doctor for not being a good little AMA douche?

This isn't to single out conservatives exclusively. There are plenty of anti-science libs, like the anti-vaccine kooks.
Should be fine. Since most of the studies go back to several studies with badly formulated data. Yamal for instance, when not cherry picked doesn't reflect the data as was presented. Universities from China, Japan and Canada have tried to recreate the hockey stick and have failed. So have independent scientists. Doesn't help either when the scientists themselves refuse to release the data, or have 'lost' the data, or have deliberately deleted the data, or are stonewalling the data.

No no. That speaks of agenda's and agenda's aren't science. That's orthodoxy, you know. Remember that thing you learned in World History class, about the Catholic Church and Indulgences? Now you remember that thing about Carbon Credits and paying people to make you feel better?

So, lets not forget that they've been saying that the arctic would be free of ice this year, um 20 years ago. Or that there would be no ice on various mountains, or all the glaciers would be gone. Or a variety of other things. Let's not forget that the MET office for example was saying that there would be no more snow in the UK, but they got snow last year. Let's not pretend either that we don't have even a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of weather in the longterm itself, but we're trying to understand climate.

Science is fine, what most conservatives believe is that indeed there is global warming. What they don't believe is that it's manmade. What they do believe is that it's either natural in some form, or there's a mechanism that's missing. Seeing as how this rock has been much warmer with CO2 levels 40x higher, and life was flourishing. Well until a giant meteor hit.
"For every human problem,
there is a neat, simple solution;
and it is always wrong."
--H.L. Mencken
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 21, 11:01 Re: Out of the Blue Enahs
  2. Jun 21, 11:35  Re: Out of the Blue sauron
  3. Jun 21, 12:10  Re: Out of the Blue eRe4s3r
  6. Jun 21, 14:03  Re: Out of the Blue Jim
  4. Jun 21, 12:23 Re: Out of the Blue Silicon Avatar
  7. Jun 21, 14:20  Re: Out of the Blue Mashiki Amiketo
  8. Jun 21, 15:13   Re: Out of the Blue TheLeech
  9. Jun 21, 15:21    Re: Out of the Blue Cutter
  10. Jun 21, 15:42     Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  11. Jun 21, 17:10     Re: Out of the Blue Retired
  15. Jun 21, 17:50      Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  16. Jun 21, 18:52       Re: Out of the Blue Rigs
  12. Jun 21, 17:17  Re: Out of the Blue RollinThundr
  13. Jun 21, 17:38   Re: Out of the Blue Retired
  17. Jun 21, 20:28    Re: Out of the Blue TheLeech
  18. Jun 22, 05:38   Re: Out of the Blue jdreyer
  21. Jun 22, 09:33    Re: Out of the Blue kanniballl
  22. Jun 22, 09:36     Re: Out of the Blue PHJF
  24. Jun 22, 12:01    Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  25. Jun 22, 19:16     Re: Out of the Blue jdreyer
  29. Jun 23, 12:28     Re: Out of the Blue Orogogus
  30. Jun 23, 14:09      Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  31. Jun 23, 14:42       Re: Out of the Blue Orogogus
  32. Jun 23, 16:07        Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  33. Jun 23, 16:53         Re: Out of the Blue Orogogus
>> 26. Jun 22, 22:05    Re: Out of the Blue Mashiki Amiketo
  27. Jun 22, 23:52     Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  28. Jun 23, 12:22      Re: Out of the Blue Matshock
  5. Jun 21, 12:33 Re: Out of the Blue Cutter
  14. Jun 21, 17:43 Re: Out of the Blue Zadig
  23. Jun 22, 10:01  Re: Out of the Blue kanniballl
  19. Jun 22, 08:25 Re: Out of the Blue Mr. Tact
  20. Jun 22, 09:10  Re: Out of the Blue nin


Blue's News logo