8.
 
Re: It Came from E3 2012, Part 5
Jun 8, 2012, 00:27
8.
Re: It Came from E3 2012, Part 5 Jun 8, 2012, 00:27
Jun 8, 2012, 00:27
 
Prez wrote on Jun 7, 2012, 22:44:
And if the booth sluts have no problem with allowing themsevles to be exploited why should anyone else?

I agree with your sentiment but I don't like calling them sluts. A guy being sexually active with multiple sex partners is considered a "stud", or at the very least as having a healthy male sex life. Why then should women be put down for doing the same thing? Let them revel in their sexuality as well; fair is fair after all.

I never said anywhere that slut was the domain of women. I've always been all for sex, drugs, and rock'n'roll, but we're not talking about a personal lifestyle choice here, we're talking about trading sex(uality) for money. The whole thing is cheap and explotive on both sides - as in the companies using them and them allowing it. There's nothing good in this, which is much different from a healthy sex life. It's really just a milder form of prostitution. Even porn stars are more honest by taking it all the way. It's probably why I never find these sort of women the least bit attractive. Quite the opposite in fact.
"The horse I bet on was so slow, the jockey kept a diary of the trip." - Henny Youngman
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 7, 2012Jun 7 2012
2.
Jun 7, 2012Jun 7 2012
11.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
3.
Jun 7, 2012Jun 7 2012
5.
Jun 7, 2012Jun 7 2012
4.
Jun 7, 2012Jun 7 2012
6.
Jun 7, 2012Jun 7 2012
 8.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
  Re: It Came from E3 2012, Part 5
9.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
10.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
12.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
15.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
13.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012
14.
Jun 8, 2012Jun 8 2012