Op Ed

GOG.com’s Trevor Longino - Diablo III style DRM could make us ‘lose a chunk of gaming history.”
Games like Diablo III with bespoke constantly online DRM could be lost to gaming culture at large if for any reason the games publisher or developer stops supporting that infrastructure. So when you lose that online connection, you lose a chunk of gaming history.

View : : :
54.
 
Re: Op Ed
May 29, 2012, 11:48
54.
Re: Op Ed May 29, 2012, 11:48
May 29, 2012, 11:48
 
Ant wrote on May 29, 2012, 09:40:
Slashman wrote on May 29, 2012, 09:30:
See this is what I don't get.

All reviews say basically the same things: Weak/overdone story, the obvious always online downside, doesn't innovate or add anything significant to the genre, normal mode too easy and item stats are wonky(differences between legendary and rares??). Removal of tweakable stats is questionable.

Then they all go on to say the game is great, give it a 9/10 and advise people to go out and buy it. All of them. Its like they swallowed some kind of mind-altering, Blizzard-slave making drug. Its like if that stuff was present in any other game but Diablo 3 it would be getting a 6 or 7. Instead, it gets a 9.
Yeah. Use apostrophe for "its" (it's = it is).

Bah...I was still waking up. I don't usually do that.

Thanks grammar police person!! Dunce
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
2.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
16.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
17.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
18.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
   Re: Op Ed
19.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
    Re: Op Ed
20.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
    Re: Op Ed
24.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
     Re: Op Ed
26.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
      Re: Op Ed
27.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
       Re: Op Ed
29.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
   Re: Op Ed
3.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
4.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
7.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
21.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
5.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
6.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
9.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
22.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
23.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
25.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
   Re: Op Ed
28.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
    Re: Op Ed
30.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
     Re: Op Ed
31.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
      Re: Op Ed
32.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
       Re: Op Ed
33.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
        Re: Op Ed
34.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
       Re: Op Ed
35.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
        Re: Op Ed
36.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
         Re: Op Ed
38.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
        Re: Op Ed
39.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
         Re: Op Ed
40.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
          Re: Op Ed
41.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
           Re: Op Ed
43.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
            Re: Op Ed
44.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
             Re: Op Ed
47.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
              Re: Op Ed
42.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
         Re: Op Ed
8.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
10.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
11.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
12.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
   Re: Op Ed
13.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
    Re: Op Ed
14.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
     Re: Op Ed
15.
May 28, 2012May 28 2012
     Re: Op Ed
37.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
45.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
46.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
48.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
49.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
50.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
 54.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
   Re: Op Ed
55.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
    Re: Op Ed
51.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
52.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012
53.
May 29, 2012May 29 2012