Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

On EA and Indies

An interview on Rock, Paper, Shotgun talks with Nels Anderson of Klei about working with EA's Partners program. After EA took some heat for offering an "indie" bundle, Anderson explains that a lot of those games could not have been created without EA, which some would say is the reason this all doesn't qualify as "indie." Here's one of his comments:

First, all the games in this bundle were published via the EA Partners program. Itís the same group that Valve uses to release their games on consoles. Itís actually a very small group of people within EA and the people that run it are separate from EAís internal studios.

And it really is a partnership. I never saw anything that could even be vaguely considered creative pressure. EAP got on board with the games because they liked the concepts and the developers! I think they understood that total creative freedom was very important to all the developers involved in these projects.

16. Re: On EA and Indies May 6, 2012, 00:28 Lesaonar
Beelzebud wrote on May 5, 2012, 15:49:
They took the concept from the Humble Indie Bundle, so when people see "Indie Bundle" they assume that this is being handled as a 'pay what you want' promotion, and some of the money goes to charity.

Even though I can't stand EA, that's more than just a stretch. Only a simp would equate a $20 game bundle, sold on digital distribution, to a pay what you want and split who gets what ideology sold from the humble bundle site.

Beelzebud wrote on May 5, 2012, 15:49:
What EA did was co-opt the "indie bundle" brand, and charge 20.00 for it, with no money going to charity. If they don't see why people are upset about it, they're more tone deaf than I imagined.

What EA did was call the bundle something it wasn't, to cash in on the "indie" craze going on. Again only a simp would confuse the humble bundle ideology and what EA offered as an indie product.

Beelzebud wrote on May 5, 2012, 15:49:
Are these games technically made by indie studios? Yeah, but that's not what people are pissed about here. It's EA brazenly using the "indie bundle" concept to turn a quick buck for themselves.

Technically, no they're not indie if EA is involved as a publisher. And that's what people are upset about. Not your assertion that EA attempted to cash in on the humble bundle craze by using indie bundle as a name for a group of games. The only thing you got right, and only that partially, is the fact that EA's attempting to cash in on the indie game craze.

This comment was edited on May 6, 2012, 01:48.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. May 5, 15:49 Re: On EA and Indies Beelzebud
  2. May 5, 15:57  Re: On EA and Indies [VG]Reagle
  3. May 5, 16:04  Re: On EA and Indies deqer
  4. May 5, 16:29   Re: On EA and Indies Prez
  10. May 5, 20:10  Re: On EA and Indies ViRGE
  11. May 5, 21:37   Re: On EA and Indies {PH}88fingers
  12. May 5, 22:17   Re: On EA and Indies Jerykk
  13. May 5, 22:56    Re: On EA and Indies Quboid
  14. May 5, 23:09     Re: On EA and Indies Jerykk
>> 16. May 6, 00:28  Re: On EA and Indies Lesaonar
  17. May 6, 03:52  Re: On EA and Indies spindoctor
  5. May 5, 16:33 Re: On EA and Indies RollinThundr
  7. May 5, 19:39  Re: On EA and Indies killer_roach
  8. May 5, 19:46   Re: On EA and Indies SimplyMonk
  9. May 5, 19:57   Re: On EA and Indies Bhruic
  6. May 5, 19:36 Re: On EA and Indies Cutter
  15. May 6, 00:01 Re: On EA and Indies Creston
  18. May 6, 10:32 Re: On EA and Indies Silicon Avatar
  19. May 6, 11:43 Re: On EA and Indies Parallax Abstraction
  20. May 6, 22:54  Re: On EA and Indies Jerykk


Blue's News logo