Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Op Ed

HotHardware - If You Resell Your Used Games, The Terrorists Win. Thanks Ant via Slashdot.
Both Browne and Braben conflate hating GameStop (a thoroughly reasonable life choice) with the supposed evils of the used games market. Braben goes so far as to claim that used games are actually responsible for high game prices and that "prices would have come down long ago if the industry was getting a share of the resells." Amazingly, no game publishers have stepped forward to publicly pledge themselves to lower game prices in exchange for a cut of used game sales.

46. Re: Op Ed Apr 24, 2012, 03:32 Bhruic
If your argument revolves around rights and entitlements, then yes, it's about legality and not practical results

It doesn't revolve around them, it uses them to demonstrate the reality of the situation.

Without used sales, stores would only be able to sell new copies. Once they run out of new copies, they'd have to order more from the publisher. Used copies help retailers avoid buying more copies from publishers, thus denying them compensation that they would have earned had used copies not been available.

See, this is where the blinders come in. To you, any sale should have the publishers being "compensated". Conveniently, of course, overlooking the example of the block of cheese I used to point out how idiotic that viewpoint is.

Fine, if you want to think of it from that perspective, every single sale of a game from a store is a used sale, so the publishers and developers should get paid more. When a store buys a game from a publisher, that's the sale. The store owns the copy. They then turn around and sell the game to other people, a clear case of a used sale! Sure, the store paid the publisher for the copy when they bought it, but now they are reselling the game, and the publisher isn't getting a cut of it!

Again, a completely ludicrous position, but it's the logical progression of the argument you are making.

Why do you think GameStop loves used sales so much? It's pure profit for them.

Of course it is. That's because they've managed to effectively corner the market. The profit doesn't come from not compensating the publishers, the profit comes from ripping off consumers. When Gamestop can buy a used copy of a game from a customer at a much lower price than the publisher is charging, who do you expect them to buy from? Consumers are stupid to sell their games for so little when Gamestop resells them for so much. And other stores/companies are stupid for letting this happen without trying to get in on the action.

Hell, if publishers had any brains at all, they'd get into the used sale business. If they re-bought their own games at the prices Gamestop is charging (well, a little higher to beat out Gamestop), they'd be able to make the profits that Gamestop is making. But they've got the same blinders on that you have, and are more concerned with trying to combat a problem that only exists because they've ignored it.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Apr 21, 16:35 Re: Op Ed CommunistHamster
  4. Apr 21, 19:19  Re: Op Ed Draugr
  2. Apr 21, 16:58 Re: Op Ed space captain
  3. Apr 21, 19:13 Re: Op Ed Dev
  5. Apr 21, 19:31  Re: Op Ed Draugr
  6. Apr 21, 20:06   Re: Op Ed NKD
  9. Apr 21, 23:04    Re: Op Ed Draugr
  10. Apr 21, 23:49    Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  14. Apr 22, 04:18     Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  17. Apr 22, 07:59      Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  25. Apr 23, 00:47       Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  26. Apr 23, 01:28        Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  27. Apr 23, 01:49         Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  28. Apr 23, 02:57          Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  30. Apr 23, 03:35           Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  32. Apr 23, 04:20            Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  33. Apr 23, 04:54             Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  34. Apr 23, 07:08              Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  37. Apr 23, 12:30               Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  38. Apr 23, 18:23                Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  39. Apr 23, 20:29                 Re: Op Ed Sepharo
  40. Apr 23, 23:15                  Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  41. Apr 24, 00:12                 Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  42. Apr 24, 01:56                  Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  44. Apr 24, 03:14                   Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  47. Apr 24, 03:35                    Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  49. Apr 24, 17:17                     Re: Op Ed Dev
  48. Apr 24, 05:28                    Re: Op Ed Kabuto
  51. Apr 25, 03:27                     Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  43. Apr 24, 03:08                Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  45. Apr 24, 03:21                 Re: Op Ed Jerykk
>> 46. Apr 24, 03:32                  Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  50. Apr 25, 03:09                   Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  52. Apr 25, 13:42                    Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  53. Apr 26, 01:27                     Re: Op Ed Jerykk
  35. Apr 23, 07:36              Re: Op Ed NKD
  36. Apr 23, 10:00               Re: Op Ed Beamer
  29. Apr 23, 03:07          Re: Op Ed PHJF
  23. Apr 22, 22:40      Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  24. Apr 23, 00:12       Re: Op Ed NKD
  31. Apr 23, 04:12        Re: Op Ed Bhruic
  13. Apr 22, 02:19    Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  15. Apr 22, 05:15    Re: Op Ed Kajetan
  18. Apr 22, 09:24    Re: Op Ed psulli
  19. Apr 22, 11:46     Re: Op Ed StingingVelvet
  21. Apr 22, 12:14     Re: Op Ed NKD
  22. Apr 22, 15:40     impressive! space captain
  7. Apr 21, 21:01 Re: Op Ed Ruffiana
  8. Apr 21, 22:11  ear against the wall space captain
  11. Apr 21, 23:51 letter to control about the big brother space captain
  12. Apr 22, 00:44  Re: letter to control about the big brother Agent.X7
  20. Apr 22, 11:55   Re: letter to control about the big brother Parallax Abstraction
  16. Apr 22, 06:27  Re: letter to control about the big brother Ruffiana


Blue's News logo