Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned

In spite of EA saying the original "under-performed," a sequel to Bulletstorm was in the works at People Can Fly before being cancelled by parent company Epic Games reports GameSpot, who hear from Epic president Mike Capps on the topic. Mike indicates they have put the Polish developer on a different project they will "be announcing pretty soon," though there is no clue if this is the recently revealed PC game Epic is planning. "We thought a lot about a sequel, and had done some initial development on it, but we found a project that we thought was a better fit for People Can Fly," he said. "We haven't announced that yet, but we will be announcing it pretty soon." He goes on to praise Bulletstorm and says he'd love to go back to the property, "but right now we don't have anything to talk about." Just to stir the pot a little, the story concludes with Capps' comment that sales of the PC version may have been harmed by piracy: "We made a PC version of Bulletstorm, and it didn't do very well on PC and I think a lot of that was due to piracy. It wasn't the best PC port ever, sure, but also piracy was a pretty big problem."
View : : :
220.
 
Re: Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned
Apr 12, 2012, 12:09
Verno
 
Re: Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned Apr 12, 2012, 12:09
Apr 12, 2012, 12:09
 Verno
 
StingingVelvet wrote on Apr 12, 2012, 11:32:
It's not a straw man when the entire point I was making is that these people losing money means more regulation. Why do you think SOPA wasn't the end of it?

It was a silly straw man linked to vague personal anecdotes. Waving your hands and shouting "Companies are losing money to piracy!" doesn't make it true and even if it were, the degree of is far more important than the fact itself.

SOPA isn't the end of it because corporations are always trying to influence policy, it's not restricted to media industries either. That's par for the course. There is no correlation of legislation introduction to piracy statistics, domestically or internationally.

Why are they slowly but surely moving all consumers to closed systems?

In general, to have more control over the revenue stream, it has nothing to do with piracy. This is a goal that pretty much every corporation has in almost every industry. Cut out middle suppliers whenever possible, go direct to the consumer, tighter pricing control, choke alternatives out and so on. "Its just business" as you would likely say. It often has nothing to do with piracy, it could cease to exist tomorrow and they would find a new justification for the same behavior.

You also have to keep in mind that a lot of these industries aren't managed by the most technically minded folk to put it lightly. They idea of how to respond to piracy is usually going to be incredibly drastic and likely have little input behind it. These are not people I want having any level of access to underlying systems of the internet without a shitload of oversight and public opinion.

There is a consistent idea on this forum that these companies have to just suck it up and deal with it, you even post that same kind of thing below.

No, I did not say that. I said it's always a factor. I also said that companies are better served by fighting piracy through more legitimate means as it is more upsides to their bottom line than draconian laws that aren't even enforceable.

For someone who supposedly has centrist views you have failed to consider any consumer perspective here. We should have reasonable copyright laws passed through intelligent debate with as many viewpoints as possible considered. That would be fair to corporations and consumers. We shouldn't allow corporations to start hacking away at pieces of the internet just because they feel threatened. That's not reasonable at all and could serve to harm legitimate industries a lot more than it ever will hurt "dudes i know downloading movies". There is too much at stake here for knee jerk reactions and one sided views.

It is incredibly easy to steal music but the legitimate digital alternatives continue to grow and be profitable. Does the fact that some people pirate music make it ok for the RIAA to do whatever it wants through any avenue it pleases, including illegal activities like political bribery? Of course not. We don't need to break the internet because "abuse" exists. Your argument that "its all inevitable because people are abusing it" is just silly dismissive fluff because you don't like the counter-opinions you're hearing. As technology evolves we'll continue to need changes to existing law, that doesn't mean corporations will get a big win button to do whatever they want. If that was the case they would ended ventures like Youtube long ago and in fact already did their best to try.

tl;dr - of course "regulation" will progress as technology does, that doesn't mean corporations will get to do whatever they want nor are justified in doing so because "abuse" exists. Degrees are what is important here. The degree of abuse and the degree of regulation.

This comment was edited on Apr 12, 2012, 12:47.
Playing: Ys VIII, Hades, Demons Souls
Watching: The Expanse, Tenet, Peninsula
Avatar 51617
Date
Subject
Author
89.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
201.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
91.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
92.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
93.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
96.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
112.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
82.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
111.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
114.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
117.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
119.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
122.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
123.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
124.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
126.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
130.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
132.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
129.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
125.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
127.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
128.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
139.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
162.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
165.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
168.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
180.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
181.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
185.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
189.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
170.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
153.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
131.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
137.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
141.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
145.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
133.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
144.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
146.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
147.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
135.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
188.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
192.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
196.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
202.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
204.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
205.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
208.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
224.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
225.
Apr 13, 2012Apr 13 2012
226.
Apr 13, 2012Apr 13 2012
194.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
195.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
199.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
200.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
203.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
206.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
207.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
210.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
212.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
213.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
215.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
217.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
221.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
66.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
190.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
193.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
173.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
175.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
186.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
197.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
198.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
163.
Apr 10, 2012Apr 10 2012
176.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
174.
Apr 11, 2012Apr 11 2012
219.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
 220.
Apr 12, 2012Apr 12 2012
  Re: Bulletstorm Sequel Cancelled; PC Piracy Mentioned
235.
Apr 14, 2012Apr 14 2012
236.
Apr 14, 2012Apr 14 2012
237.
Apr 14, 2012Apr 14 2012
238.
Apr 15, 2012Apr 15 2012