Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Chicago, IL 11/17

Regularly scheduled events

etc., etc.

21. Re: etc., etc. Feb 12, 2012, 17:17 Orogogus
But you don't have any evidence, or even anything that might even suggest your case. It just seems more likely to me that there would simply be less money in the industry if it were just PCs, and that would make more difference than the state of the hardware.

I can easily identify games that were scaled back due to consoles. But would those games have been made at all if they were going to be PC only? It seems improbable, because you're basically talking about half or less of the profit and therefore a smaller budget. Instead of AAA games like Skyrim you get AA or A games like, I guess, S.T.A.L.K.E.R., and still don't end up pushing the envelope.

Further, if hardware did advance more quickly, the games taking advantage of it would cost more to make, too. It's likely that hardware also hasn't jumped forward because there's no corresponding market expansion that would pay for the additional work required to make bigger and better games. There are commenters on Blue's who already feel that publishers are chasing pipe dreams launching as many high budget games as they already do.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Feb 10, 21:16 Re: etc., etc. Frags4Fun
  2. Feb 10, 22:42  Re: etc., etc. Dev
  4. Feb 10, 23:07   Re: etc., etc. Fletch
  11. Feb 11, 08:54    Re: etc., etc. DNForever
  12. Feb 11, 12:41    Re: etc., etc. Quboid
  14. Feb 12, 01:16     Re: etc., etc. Fletch
  15. Feb 12, 01:33      Re: etc., etc. Dev
  5. Feb 11, 00:36   Re: etc., etc. Frags4Fun
  18. Feb 12, 15:26    Re: etc., etc. Fantaz
  7. Feb 11, 00:46   Re: etc., etc. jdreyer
  8. Feb 11, 01:05    Re: etc., etc. PHJF
  9. Feb 11, 01:15     Re: etc., etc. killer_roach
  10. Feb 11, 05:37      Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  13. Feb 11, 13:41       Re: etc., etc. Dev
  16. Feb 12, 12:31        Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  17. Feb 12, 13:44         Re: etc., etc. Dev
  19. Feb 12, 15:49          Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  20. Feb 12, 16:34           Re: etc., etc. Dev
>> 21. Feb 12, 17:17            Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  22. Feb 12, 19:27             Re: etc., etc. Dev
  23. Feb 12, 20:28              Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  24. Feb 13, 02:38               Re: etc., etc. Dev
  25. Feb 13, 03:19                Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  26. Feb 13, 04:56                 Re: etc., etc. Dev
  27. Feb 13, 14:12                  Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  3. Feb 10, 23:04 Re: etc., etc. shiho
  6. Feb 11, 00:45 Re: etc., etc. space captain
  28. Feb 13, 14:23 Re: etc., etc. Dev
  29. Feb 13, 16:05  Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  30. Feb 14, 06:04   Re: etc., etc. Dev
  31. Feb 15, 04:11    Re: etc., etc. Orogogus

Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.


Blue's News logo