Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
United Kingdom 06/02

Regularly scheduled events

etc., etc.

13. Re: etc., etc. Feb 11, 2012, 13:41 Dev
Orogogus wrote on Feb 11, 2012, 05:37:
The anti-console argument seems to suppose that if there were no consoles, every console gamer would have a high end gaming PC, which seems like a grievously flawed premise. Without the console base, the sales base would be cut in half (being generous). How many PC-only games have pushed the limits of hardware? Witcher 2 is going to the 360. Maybe Civilization 5? Or Diablo 3 or Starcraft 2? It seems more likely that without the consoles providing additional income streams, there would just be less games period and the bar would be lowered all the way down to Facebook games and whatever Blizzard puts out.
No thats not my argument at all. My argument is that top end of PC gaming development (graphics especially) would be far more advanced without consoles. The PC edge would have been pushed further and faster.

That has nothing to do with every consoler buying a PC.

Even if that were the case it would be likely to be a $300 one, not a top end gaming one. Remember the days when it took $1000 PC to be a gaming PC? Nowadays a gaming computer can be built for $500 or less (in large part because its not needed to buy a top end CPU & graphics card to get high settings for most games on 720p type graphics, due in large part to consoles holding back the development).
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Feb 10, 21:16 Re: etc., etc. Frags4Fun
  2. Feb 10, 22:42  Re: etc., etc. Dev
  4. Feb 10, 23:07   Re: etc., etc. Fletch
  11. Feb 11, 08:54    Re: etc., etc. DNForever
  12. Feb 11, 12:41    Re: etc., etc. Quboid
  14. Feb 12, 01:16     Re: etc., etc. Fletch
  15. Feb 12, 01:33      Re: etc., etc. Dev
  5. Feb 11, 00:36   Re: etc., etc. Frags4Fun
  18. Feb 12, 15:26    Re: etc., etc. Fantaz
  7. Feb 11, 00:46   Re: etc., etc. jdreyer
  8. Feb 11, 01:05    Re: etc., etc. PHJF
  9. Feb 11, 01:15     Re: etc., etc. killer_roach
  10. Feb 11, 05:37      Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
>> 13. Feb 11, 13:41       Re: etc., etc. Dev
  16. Feb 12, 12:31        Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  17. Feb 12, 13:44         Re: etc., etc. Dev
  19. Feb 12, 15:49          Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  20. Feb 12, 16:34           Re: etc., etc. Dev
  21. Feb 12, 17:17            Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  22. Feb 12, 19:27             Re: etc., etc. Dev
  23. Feb 12, 20:28              Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  24. Feb 13, 02:38               Re: etc., etc. Dev
  25. Feb 13, 03:19                Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  26. Feb 13, 04:56                 Re: etc., etc. Dev
  27. Feb 13, 14:12                  Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  3. Feb 10, 23:04 Re: etc., etc. shiho
  6. Feb 11, 00:45 Re: etc., etc. space captain
  28. Feb 13, 14:23 Re: etc., etc. Dev
  29. Feb 13, 16:05  Re: etc., etc. Orogogus
  30. Feb 14, 06:04   Re: etc., etc. Dev
  31. Feb 15, 04:11    Re: etc., etc. Orogogus

Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.


Blue's News logo