Op Ed

Kotaku - Nerds and Male Privilege.
The idea that perhaps the way women are portrayed in fandom is aleetle sexist is regularly met with denials, justifications and outright dismissal of the issue. So regularly, in fact, that there's a Bingo card covering the most common responses. Part of the notion of male privilege in fandom is that nothing is wrong with fandom and that suggestions that it might benefit from some diversity is treated as a threat.

But what is that threat, exactly?

View : : :
56.
 
Re: Op Ed
Dec 19, 2011, 06:02
56.
Re: Op Ed Dec 19, 2011, 06:02
Dec 19, 2011, 06:02
 
Morga wrote on Dec 19, 2011, 05:29:

Well what privileges? When comparing all the stats, looking across the board, it isn't men who are privileged in society, but women.

Your statistics was far from comprehensive, or 'across the board' Those are cherry picked to support his argument. The list is far-far from comprehensive.

What handed to them? You think all men have sugar daddies who come save them when they're in trouble? Hell no, for example the far majority of homeless people in every country are men.

Just because one has privilege, doesn't mean they will retain said privilege all through their life,

Of course women are not the enemy, and men are not the enemy either! Misandric feminists such as the author who wrote that article on kotaku can be considered as such though.
Don't confuse feminism with women, in general, feminists don't really represent the interests of women, such as their lack of respect for housewives.

I find it slightly amusing that you think feminism requires animosity towards stay at home moms/housewives. In this case, The point of feminism is, just like males, women would have the ability to choose how they live their lives. Most people I know that would consider themselves feminists would not agree with you that feminists are people that hate housewives. If thats what they choose to do with their life than so be it, that was THEIR choice.
Also, to call this article misandric is just false. You might not like what it has to say, but at no point does it strike a tone that is disparaging towards the male gender.

If you're looking for a website that really does a good job truly tackling subjects like real misandry, misogyny, etc. I'd recommend, https://noseriouslywhatabouttehmenz.wordpress.com/
Certainly not perfect, but what is. Of course, some might not like it because it doesn't pretend its us vs them.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
2.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
18.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
37.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
   Re: Op Ed
38.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
    Re: Op Ed
3.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
4.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
5.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
64.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
   Re: Op Ed
7.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
8.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
   Re: Op Ed
9.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
    Re: Op Ed
11.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
    Re: Op Ed
6.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
10.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
12.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
13.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
14.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
15.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
16.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
20.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
17.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
19.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
31.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
33.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
34.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
35.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
21.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
22.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
26.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
32.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
36.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
   Re: Op Ed
41.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
    Re: Op Ed
42.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
    Re: Op Ed
43.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
     Re: Op Ed
49.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
      Re: Op Ed
51.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
       Re: Op Ed
44.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
     Re: Op Ed
45.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
      Re: Op Ed
46.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
       Re: Op Ed
47.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
        Re: Op Ed
66.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
        Re: Op Ed
67.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
         Re: Op Ed
69.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
          Re: Op Ed
70.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
           Re: Op Ed
71.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
            Re: Op Ed
72.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
             Re: Op Ed
73.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
              Re: Op Ed
74.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
             Re: Op Ed
79.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
             Re: Op Ed
80.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
              Re: Op Ed
81.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
               Re: Op Ed
82.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
                Re: Op Ed
83.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
                 Re: Op Ed
76.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
          Re: Op Ed
77.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
           Re: Op Ed
23.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
24.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
25.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
27.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
28.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
29.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
48.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
50.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
   Re: Op Ed
52.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
    Re: Op Ed
53.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
    Re: Op Ed
54.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
     Re: Op Ed
55.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
      Re: Op Ed
 56.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
       Re: Op Ed
57.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
      Re: Op Ed
58.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
       Re: Op Ed
59.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
     Re: Op Ed
62.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
      Re: Op Ed
78.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
      Re: Op Ed
60.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
    Re: Op Ed
63.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
     Re: Op Ed
65.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
      Re: Op Ed
30.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
39.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
40.
Dec 18, 2011Dec 18 2011
61.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
68.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011
75.
Dec 19, 2011Dec 19 2011