Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings

Morning Consolidation

20. Re: Morning Consolidation Dec 9, 2011, 10:36 Beamer
Dades wrote on Dec 8, 2011, 20:44:
Beamer wrote on Dec 8, 2011, 18:08:
Yes, the Supreme Court allowed it in the AT&T case. Was that a click-through?
And since the Supreme Court case several State courts have still allowed class action lawsuits to be filed and continued.

Are you some corporate stoogie ignoring the point on purpose? Microsoft inserting it into their agreement is a clear attempt to avoid class action suits. Some states refusing to recognize it doesn't mean it's ok for them to do this.

We're having a hard time seeing Microsoft as some innocent party in this, you're going to need to draw a line for us.

Yes, of COURSE that is why Microsoft is doing it. Derr! At this point it's probably malpractice for an attorney to NOT put it in a contract.

Wait, that's important, so I'll let it sink in here - if an attorney does NOT put this in a contract he can likely be sued for malpractice. Do you know what that means?


And states are finding ways around this, because it's unconscionable to hold people to this in 99% of contracts.
Is this something to be happy about? Of course not.
Is this something to act like Microsoft is evil for? No. They're not good, but they're not evil. Every single company will do this because if they don't and they get drawn into a class action lawsuit they will sue their attorneys, so their attorneys will make sure this clause is in everything.
Is this something that will last? No fucking way. The Court really fucked this up. It will be a short bump in our legal history before it's completely decimated and torn apart.
Music for the discerning:
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Dec 8, 12:09 Re: You can't opt out of the "no class-action" Xbox 360 TOS update after all mch
  3. Dec 8, 12:36  Re: You can't opt out of the Verno
  2. Dec 8, 12:16 Re: Morning Consolidation winnetou
  22. Dec 9, 21:13  Re: Morning Consolidation Ant
  4. Dec 8, 12:44 Re: Morning Consolidation avianflu
  5. Dec 8, 12:49  Re: Morning Consolidation Verno
  6. Dec 8, 13:55   Re: Morning Consolidation theyarecomingforyou
  7. Dec 8, 14:27    Re: Morning Consolidation Beamer
  8. Dec 8, 14:32    Re: Morning Consolidation LittleMe
  9. Dec 8, 14:48     Re: Morning Consolidation theyarecomingforyou
  10. Dec 8, 14:48     Re: Morning Consolidation mch
  11. Dec 8, 15:11      Re: Morning Consolidation Zarkonis
  12. Dec 8, 15:18       Re: Morning Consolidation Beamer
  13. Dec 8, 15:35        Re: Morning Consolidation theyarecomingforyou
  14. Dec 8, 16:55        Re: Morning Consolidation Dades
  15. Dec 8, 17:00         Re: Morning Consolidation Beamer
  16. Dec 8, 17:33 Re: Morning Consolidation Dades
  17. Dec 8, 18:08  Re: Morning Consolidation Beamer
  19. Dec 8, 20:44   Re: Morning Consolidation Dades
>> 20. Dec 9, 10:36    Re: Morning Consolidation Beamer
  21. Dec 9, 11:17     Re: Morning Consolidation Dades
  18. Dec 8, 19:32 Re: Morning Consolidation Ruffiana


Blue's News logo