No PC Ghost Recon: Future Soldier

Though plans for a PC edition of Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier was previously confirmed by Ubisoft, PC Gamer has word that the next installment in the Ghost Recon series is for consoles only, and that PC gamers will get Ghost Recon Online instead, which is apparently Ubisoft's new approach to PC piracy following their almost universally despised always-on DRM. Here's word from Ghost Recon Online producer Sébastien Arnoult:
We are giving away most of the content for free because there’s no barrier to entry. To the users that are traditionally playing the game by getting it through Pirate Bay, we said, ‘Okay, go ahead guys. This is what you’re asking for. We’ve listened to you – we’re giving you this experience. It’s easy to download, there’s no DRM that will pollute your experience.’

We’re adapting the offer to the PC market. I don’t like to compare PC and Xbox boxed products because they have a model on that platform that is clearly meant to be €60’s worth of super-Hollywood content. On PC, we’re adapting our model to the demand.

“When we started Ghost Recon Online we were thinking about Ghost Recon: Future Solider; having something ported in the classical way without any deep development, because we know that 95% of our consumers will pirate the game. So we said okay, we have to change our mind.

We have to adapt, we have to embrace this instead of pushing it away. That’s the main reflection behind Ghost Recon Online and the choice we’ve made to go in this direction.
View : : :
155.
 
Re: No PC Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Nov 25, 2011, 18:22
Re: No PC Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Nov 25, 2011, 18:22
Nov 25, 2011, 18:22
 
shponglefan wrote on Nov 25, 2011, 16:39:
a) Prices are generall lower than in the past and in some cases vastly lower;

As was said, fallacy of the worst kind. Even taking into account inflation and money devaluation over time, no, games weren't that vastly lower. They were about 20-25% lower comparing consumer purchase power to then and to nowadays.

shponglefan wrote on Nov 25, 2011, 16:39:
b) Quality gaming exists in abundance; while there is a ton of crap shovelware out there, it's not at all comparable to the 1978 situation;

Uuuh, it's exactly like 78. Publishers are pushing a lot of games per month (Just look at the past two months) and you only have to see the forums and the NPD numbers, amongst others, to see people are indeed buying less games. From the past 3 years, only about 8 or 9 months of the whole 36 showed an increase in sales, the rest was a decrease. And I mean software only, if we take hardware into account, namely consoles, the picture's more dire. The forums are also a good indication, console and PC alike, that people are getting fed up with the quality of games. Also, there's a major, vast migration going into other platforms, like mobile, and publishers are not adapting into it.

So yes, exactly like the 78 situation. Too many games released, not enough quality and more importantly, we're in a recession, closing on a full-blown depression. People have and do spend money on far more important and vital things. Add to this the prices of games escalating like it hasn't happened in a long time and you can see the whole picture. People will spend their money in less games because they cannot buy all games even if they wanted, they need to buy more important goods other than luxury and with the recession people are saving more and spending less. And the publishers are blind to all that and keep on hanging to a vastly obsolete business model. And I'm not even touching on the escalating development costs of games which, again, is exactly like 78. See ET in Wikipedia as the prime example of the folly of 78.

shponglefan wrote on Nov 25, 2011, 16:39:
c) New technology continues to allow for new avenues for gaming (like cell phones;

See above. There is indeed a vast migration into mobile platforms. Problem for the publishers, the price of a mobile game is about 80% cheaper or more than a full blown game. Publishers, spending millions in game development, are still not adapting to the mobile market, plus they are very resistant to changing their business model. That is not good for the industry in the medium and long term.

shponglefan wrote on Nov 25, 2011, 16:39:
d) Digital distribution eliminates the need for manufacturing/inventory costs, thus eliminating a huge chunk of costs and associate risks.

But digital distribution is still only used in a huge scale on the PC, and the PC, apart from the indies, is not the focus of the publishers, another major mistake. As such, publishers either ignore the benefits of digital distribution or implement terrible ideas like digital copies being as expensive or even more expensive than physical copies. It does eliminate a huge chunk of distribution costs for publishers but only if the console universe also adapts to it, and even so with their culture of second hand games I doubt the console gamers will adapt to this anytime soon.

shponglefan wrote on Nov 25, 2011, 16:39:
So no, this is not the same as the lead-up to the prior crash. Not by a long shot.

I disagree. In fact I lived through 78 and I can tell you, today is very, very much like 78.
Date
Subject
Author
2.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
3.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
42.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
43.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
48.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
49.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
53.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
60.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
61.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
44.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
45.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
5.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
6.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
7.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
8.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
93.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
95.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
10.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
12.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
14.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
15.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
16.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
18.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
19.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
20.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
23.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
24.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
25.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
27.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
31.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
66.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
21.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
36.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
22.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
26.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
28.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
30.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
32.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
33.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
35.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
34.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
29.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
40.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
46.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
58.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
64.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
     Re: Sour Grapes
68.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
      Re: Sour Grapes
41.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
63.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
39.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
38.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
47.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
50.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
51.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
52.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
54.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
55.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
56.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
59.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
62.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
65.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
67.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
74.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
88.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
70.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
71.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
72.
Nov 24, 2011Nov 24 2011
76.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
77.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
78.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
80.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
81.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
82.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
83.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
84.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
85.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
100.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
104.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
105.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
128.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
131.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
86.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
91.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
92.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
130.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
97.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
123.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
135.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
87.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
89.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
90.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
96.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
98.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
122.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
94.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
99.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
101.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
102.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
103.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
106.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
109.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
112.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
116.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
156.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
158.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
159.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
160.
Nov 26, 2011Nov 26 2011
161.
Nov 26, 2011Nov 26 2011
162.
Nov 26, 2011Nov 26 2011
163.
Nov 26, 2011Nov 26 2011
164.
Nov 26, 2011Nov 26 2011
165.
Nov 26, 2011Nov 26 2011
             Re: No PC Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
167.
Nov 27, 2011Nov 27 2011
              Re: No PC Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
173.
Nov 29, 2011Nov 29 2011
121.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
111.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
113.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
144.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
152.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
154.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
157.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
169.
Nov 27, 2011Nov 27 2011
170.
Nov 27, 2011Nov 27 2011
171.
Nov 27, 2011Nov 27 2011
172.
Nov 28, 2011Nov 28 2011
115.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
124.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
107.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
108.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
110.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
114.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
117.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
118.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
120.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
137.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
119.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
125.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
127.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
129.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
132.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
136.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
138.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
140.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
126.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
133.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
134.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
139.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
141.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
142.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
153.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
 155.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
   Re: No PC Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
151.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
143.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
145.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
146.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
150.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
147.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
148.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
149.
Nov 25, 2011Nov 25 2011
168.
Nov 27, 2011Nov 27 2011