id On RAGE "Cluster!@#$" and Lead Platforms [Oct 07, 2011, 8:33 pm ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
Kotaku asks the musical question "Why Was The PC Launch of Rage Such A "Cluster!@#$"?," getting answers from id on the topic, who express frustration with problems that were largely caused by driver issues. Along the way they also address how the game being designed for consoles holds back the PC edition. "You can choose to design a game around the specs of a high-end PC and make console versions that fail to hit the design point, or design around the specs of the consoles and have a high-end PC provide incremental quality improvements," John Carmack tells them. "We chose the latter." He also bluntly addresses why this makes sense for id (emphasis Kotaku's):
"We do not see the PC as the leading platform for games," Carmack added. "That statement will enrage some people, but it is hard to characterize it otherwise; both console versions will have larger audiences than the PC version. A high end PC is nearly 10 times as powerful as a console, and we could unquestionably provide a better experience if we chose that as our design point and we were able to expend the same amount of resources on it. Nowadays most of the quality of a game comes from the development effort put into it, not the technology it runs on. A game built with a tenth the resources on a platform 10 times as powerful would be an inferior product in almost all cases."
More power means more complexity means longer development cycles and higher costs.
That's not really true at all. Yes, PC games usually go through compatibility testing but that's outsourced, takes about a week and is performed only a few times throughout the development cycle. However, PC games do not have to be submitted for certification like console games do and certification is a significantly more costly matter than compatibility testing. There are dedicated, full-time QA testers who specialize exclusively in cert testing and comprehensive cert passes are performed regularly. The actual submission for certification is very expensive and has to be planned far ahead. If you miss your scheduled submission date or fail submission, that's more money down the drain. Then you have the cost of dev and test kits. A single dev kit costs around $10,000. Most games have at least 10-20 programmers so that's $100k right there.
Then there's ease of development as well. A common misconception amongst people outside the industry is that developing for a closed platform is faster and easier. That would be true, if the closed platform weren't horribly outdated. Compiling, linking, loading and running a PC build is significantly faster process than on X360 or PS3. A modern PC can run a debug build with a higher framerate than consoles can run submission builds, making it much easier and faster to test your changes. Oh, and don't forget memory. PCs have lots of memory. It's rarely an issue for PC developers. Conversely, memory is a huge issue for console developers. Trying to work with 512MB of memory total is brutal. Do you know why RAGE's engine was designed around texture streaming? Because that's the only way to fit those textures into console memory. Console developers spend more time working around memory limitations than PC developers spend fixing compatibility issues.
That PC development still gets AAA SKU's at all is almost amazing right now.
It's not amazing at all. Developing a PC port is cheap. It's only a small fraction of the total development budget and as such, it's easy to generate a profit from. That's why more and more publishers are releasing PC versions of their multiplatform releases. In addition, digital distribution gives publishers a much larger cut of each sale than retail, making it even easier to profit from PC sales. You'd be stupid not to release a PC version of your game, unless it was in a genre that has no audience on PC.
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2022 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2022 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 27 January 2022, 03:35.