Op Ed

GameSpy - Should Diablo III have been first person?
I'll admit it. My first ever hands-on time with any Diablo game occurred just 24 hours ago, when my inexperienced Demon Hunter took his first fumbling steps into the Diablo III beta's dark and ominous dungeons. It took just three hours before I'd hacked and slashed my way to the main storyline's satisfying conclusion, but in that short period of time my eyes were opened to an entirely new perspective on a gaming world. As a lover of first person games, the isometric camera system in Diablo III felt very unfamiliar, and I inevitably wondered why Blizzard didn't make the leap to first person like so many other developers. This led me to wonder - should Diablo III have been a first person game, and what are the pros and cons of this approach? Let's find out.

View : : :
49.
 
Re: Op Ed
Sep 23, 2011, 13:09
49.
Re: Op Ed Sep 23, 2011, 13:09
Sep 23, 2011, 13:09
 
yuastnav wrote on Sep 23, 2011, 11:57:
Mhm I was not aware that there are roguelike multiplayer games.
The only one I knew was the online component of dungeon crawl stone soup which is more of a score-based ladder system or something like that.

The thing is that I wouldn't want to give up the round based concept of something like nethack.
It would not be impossible to make multiplayer, though, it would just be kinda difficult and straining on all the players because you'd always have to wait for the other player before you could make your turn again.

But thanks, I'll check that link out.

Cool, no problem. You'll see that the Wiki references Diablo under the 'mainstream success' section. I'll have to agree that a Wiki will not necessarily be the official end-all answer about the Diablo series, the included statements do follow (in my mind) that Diablo is a Roguelike hybrid of sorts, not a pure definition of the roguelike.

In the case of Diablo, it is not a turn based roguelike (hybrid), correct? So it follows that you wouldn't have to go down the path of turn-based strategy gaming with your FPS unless you wanted to. Dungeon Hack (1993) was not turn based and not strategic per se. It was all real-time until you 'rested'.

I do understand your preference for the round based nethack concept, however. Unfortunately, there are less and less of us able to focus on those types of games anymore (turn based real-time strategy). The FPS idea cannot dwell on that mechanic in this day and age and so is relegated to a more action based demographic.

It would be great to see games like Jagged Alliance or a 'real' X-Com come back from the dead, wouldn't it?
Avatar 24396
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
2.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
10.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
12.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
13.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
14.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
15.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
18.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
27.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
16.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
17.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
19.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
20.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
22.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
   Re: Op Ed
41.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
   Re: Op Ed
42.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
    Re: Op Ed
46.
Sep 23, 2011Sep 23 2011
     Re: Op Ed
26.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
3.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
4.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
5.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
6.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
7.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
8.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
9.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
11.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
21.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
23.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
24.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
28.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
30.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
   Re: Op Ed
25.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
29.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
31.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
32.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
33.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
34.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
35.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
36.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
   Re: Op Ed
38.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
    Re: Op Ed
40.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
     Re: Op Ed
45.
Sep 23, 2011Sep 23 2011
      Re: Op Ed
47.
Sep 23, 2011Sep 23 2011
       Re: Op Ed
48.
Sep 23, 2011Sep 23 2011
        Re: Op Ed
 49.
Sep 23, 2011Sep 23 2011
         Re: Op Ed
37.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
43.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011
   Re: Op Ed
44.
Sep 23, 2011Sep 23 2011
    Re: Op Ed
39.
Sep 22, 2011Sep 22 2011