No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City?

It seems Batman: Arkham City will not use Games for Windows LIVE, after all, as GreenManGaming tweets: "We've just received notice from Warner's that Batman is Games for Windows but NOT a Games for Windows 'Live' title!" The box art for the stealth/action sequel was revealed in June showing the GFWL logo, suggesting the game would use Microsoft's service, like Batman: Arkham Asylum did. Thanks Eurogamer.
View : : :
55.
 
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City?
Aug 29, 2011, 21:35
55.
Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City? Aug 29, 2011, 21:35
Aug 29, 2011, 21:35
 
Ecthelion wrote on Aug 29, 2011, 14:15:
Verno wrote on Aug 29, 2011, 11:46:
Arkham Asylum was perfectly playable with both the gamepad and KB/M, which you choose is a matter of preference. I will say that I preferred the gamepad simply for some feedback in that game but a friend of mine using the KB/M was pulling off ridiculous combos that put most gamepad players to shame, so they each have their ups and downs.
I only used the KB/M, and I managed to get some pretty crazy combos in the challenge maps after tons and tons of practice (I ended up getting all the achievements actually, once of which involved getting a perfect string of combos). It's probably possible on gamepads as well, but they were perfectly doable with KB/M. In general I prefer KB/M to gamepads even when the game isn't really designed for KB/M. However, I can certainly understand the appeal of playing on the couch with a gamepad. I happen to like gaming at a desk, but I realize many people think that's crazy.

I found GFWL to be unobtrusive in AA, so I didn't really care one way or the other about its inclusion in AC. However, if it's removal gets more PC gamers to buy the game, I'm glad it happened. More people need to realize what a great game the original (and hopefully the sequel) was, and I'd like to see them make more sequels as long as they can keep the stories top-notch.

Also, the cover art I've seen in the past definitely included the GFWL logo, so its removal is certainly newsworthy.

I don't really understand why GFWL exists in the first place other than to place shackles on it and help prevent piracy. Really, it's just an annoying nuisance. With Arkham Asylum, it didn't intrude too much, but I have to wonder how much performance a thing like that saps away from a game. I never use it -- I always play with an offline account and not bother logging into a friggin game.

It's stupid to make you LOG IN. You're already AT YOUR COMPUTER. I can understand logging into an online account, but it's a single player game firstly, and secondly, WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU MAKING ME LOG IN TO PLAY A GAME ON MY COMPUTER?

Make me log in if I want to use an online service, so I can have access to my account, not to play a game on my computer. It's not like I could be somebody else on my own computer. Why the fuck do you want me to log in? So yeah, I ignored it and played offline or whatever the GWFL thing calls it. Even better to not have to worry about that stupid crap in the first place. I just might buy AC if it turns out reviewers like it. (What ever happened to shareware and demo versions of games so you can try before you buy???)
Avatar 55267
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
3.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
5.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
8.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
10.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
12.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
13.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
14.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
16.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
15.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
25.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
29.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
30.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
31.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
32.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
35.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
43.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
39.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
41.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
42.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
45.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
44.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
48.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
34.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
36.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
37.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
38.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
54.
Aug 29, 2011Aug 29 2011
19.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
20.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
22.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
23.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
24.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
26.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
27.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
21.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
52.
Aug 29, 2011Aug 29 2011
57.
Aug 30, 2011Aug 30 2011
6.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
7.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
9.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
11.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
18.
Aug 27, 2011Aug 27 2011
40.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
46.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
47.
Aug 28, 2011Aug 28 2011
49.
Aug 29, 2011Aug 29 2011
51.
Aug 29, 2011Aug 29 2011
53.
Aug 29, 2011Aug 29 2011
 55.
Aug 29, 2011Aug 29 2011
  Re: No GFWL for Batman: Arkham City?
56.
Aug 30, 2011Aug 30 2011