Creston wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 19:17:Suckage wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 10:55:
I'm no fan of 5 hour-long campaigns but I would never play through Unreal's 40+ hours again, either.
Why not? It's physically impossible for you to play a game for a few hours a night for two weeks in a row, because you're trapped in a space-time continuum bubble?
Or is it just a short attention span?
Creston
Again, though, I'm mostly seeing consoles in this list. With the reasoning being that there is little backward compatibility between console generations.
There aren't a whole lot of PC games getting this treatment. And that is what most people on Blues want. Serious Sam aside, of course.
Practically no developer is ever going to simply repackage a game exactly as it was a decade ago and have the only change be that it uses modern graphics. It just won't happen.
Jerykk wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 04:28:Practically no developer is ever going to simply repackage a game exactly as it was a decade ago and have the only change be that it uses modern graphics. It just won't happen.
Actually, MS is doing exactly that with Halo Anniversary. It's the exact same game as Halo 1, only with better graphics. The first two Serious Sam games received the same treatment. In fact, there are tons of games getting this treatment, though most of them are simply "HD" upgrades (widescreen support + higher resolutions). Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia, Tomb Raider, Street Fighter, Silent Hill, Puzzle Fighter, Resident Evil, Devil May Cry, ICO, Shadow of the Colossus, Beyond Good & Evil, Earthworm Jim, Stranger's Wrath, Munch's Oddysee... HD remakes are all the rage these days. If people weren't willing to pay for them, then publishers wouldn't be making so many.
I'd pay $50 for a remake of Tribes 1 with modern graphics, in addition to having the community's script functionality integrated and the Blaster and ELF swapped out for the Shocklance. Hell, I'd pay $50 for a remake of System Shock and Deus Ex too.
Jerykk wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 19:36:Devil May Cry is a reboot though. Not necessarily the same game.
http://kotaku.com/5812491/devil-may-cry-series-getting-hd-re+releasesThe Prince of Persia games weren't identical remakes...they were more like series reboots.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2010-11-17-prince-of-persia-hd-trilogy-reviewI don't think I'd count Street Fighter either. That series has always cycled(and re-cycled) through different styles and implementations(it never really strayed too far from the original premise).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Street_Fighter_II_Turbo_HD_Remix
While it's true that most of these are more like HD remixes rather than complete graphical overhauls, the fact that so many publishers are making them shows that there must be a market for them. If they continue selling well, publishers will only become more likely to finance full graphical overhauls.
Devil May Cry is a reboot though. Not necessarily the same game.
The Prince of Persia games weren't identical remakes...they were more like series reboots.
I don't think I'd count Street Fighter either. That series has always cycled(and re-cycled) through different styles and implementations(it never really strayed too far from the original premise).
Suckage wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 10:55:
I'm no fan of 5 hour-long campaigns but I would never play through Unreal's 40+ hours again, either.
Jerykk wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 04:28:Practically no developer is ever going to simply repackage a game exactly as it was a decade ago and have the only change be that it uses modern graphics. It just won't happen.
Actually, MS is doing exactly that with Halo Anniversary. It's the exact same game as Halo 1, only with better graphics. The first two Serious Sam games received the same treatment. In fact, there are tons of games getting this treatment, though most of them are simply "HD" upgrades (widescreen support + higher resolutions). Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia, Tomb Raider, Street Fighter, Silent Hill, Puzzle Fighter, Resident Evil, Devil May Cry, ICO, Shadow of the Colossus, Beyond Good & Evil, Earthworm Jim, Stranger's Wrath, Munch's Oddysee... HD remakes are all the rage these days. If people weren't willing to pay for them, then publishers wouldn't be making so many.
I'd pay $50 for a remake of Tribes 1 with modern graphics, in addition to having the community's script functionality integrated and the Blaster and ELF swapped out for the Shocklance. Hell, I'd pay $50 for a remake of System Shock and Deus Ex too.
Slashman wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 03:18:Wolfen wrote on Jul 23, 2011, 01:53:
I would pay for a remake of the original in the new engine. It has to be the original stuff though, with just the new bells and whistles as flourishes.
Why do people keep asking for this for every old game in existence?
Practically no developer is ever going to simply repackage a game exactly as it was a decade ago and have the only change be that it uses modern graphics. It just won't happen.
The only way stuff like that gets done is through fan mods. And they are almost always NOT like the original.
All the people who say they will pay for it make up so small a number that it just wouldn't make any sense. It's a decade-old game and the game industry just doesn't work like that.