StingingVelvet wrote on Jun 18, 2011, 00:04:
Yes, and your tactic of just saying "har har your shit makes no sense so I am right" is not exactly blowing my mind either man.
Verno wrote on Jun 17, 2011, 17:56:
You already tried that tactic and I already debunked it. Acting like there is no difference between an indie developer offering a game somewhere and EA saying everyone but Steam can have it on purpose is just asinine. You're just posting in circles at this point to get the last word. In the future you should try looking at announcements without prejudice before weighing in on them, your comments here have made little sense from the beginning.
Krovven wrote on Jun 17, 2011, 18:04:
Well whatever is going on, we do not have all the info.
Alice 2 has been released on Steam.
Verno wrote on Jun 17, 2011, 08:51:StingingVelvet wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 23:38:
The only bad to come of this would be if Origin becomes like Steam is today, then we traded one dictator for another.
No it's not the only bad thing, I explained it to you in detail for almost two pages. Anything that removes consumer choice is bad in more ways than one, particularly for people who like to shop across multiple vendors.
StingingVelvet wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 23:38:
The only bad to come of this would be if Origin becomes like Steam is today, then we traded one dictator for another.
EA saying "hey we're making games come and get them at our website" is a good thing from my perspective. The only bad to come of this would be if Origin becomes like Steam is today, then we traded one dictator for another.
Dades wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 20:50:
He seems to think that because it takes market share away from Steam that it will prevent Steam from being as pervasive which in turn will keep the PC platform open. He ignores the fact that this is an action initiated by a closed platform that just encourages more closed platform behavior which is what he is afraid of in the first place. People will use Steam like use they anything else. They'll use it until something better comes along.
Krovven wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 19:54:
Huh, what? Origin is NOT an open platform. Maybe you are referring to Steam having "to work"?
Origin is a closed platform that is only going to sell EA published games. If they remove their games from other services, how is this good, and in any way beneficial to anyone other than EA?
It does make sense from my point of view. That's where you're arrogant, you assume you're automatically right and that I'm an idiot.
You say this as if it's fact but I see it happening differently. I see the people who only shop on Steam, I see the indie devs who act like you have to get on Steam to make money, I see gaming journalists acting like Steam is the only game in town, I see that over half my boxes from amazon tie to Steam.
StingingVelvet wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 19:44:
That's why I look forward to Origin or whatever else taking some of their market away, putting that open platform to work.
Dades wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 18:42:
You admitted wanting to see Steam hurt even if it makes no sense.
The justification you use to arrive at your opinion isn't what I was talking about. Steam has competition and people don't just buy games from Steam in case you're genuinely worried about it. Some people might do that but some people also like country music and the world carries on.
No one can monopolize an open platform, stop worrying about the who and worry instead about the why.
StingingVelvet wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 17:41:
What I admitted is that my desire to see Steam become less powerful might be coloring my priorities. I don't have a bias against Steam as far as disliking it or wanting it to fail. As I have said multiple times I buy Steamworks games and prefer Steamworks to any other multiplayer solution right now. I just don't like how big Steam has gotten and how many people only use Steam for gaming purchases.
Dades wrote on Jun 16, 2011, 15:14:
Yeah, you're right. I apologize. It was a cheap ding, it takes a big person to admit their own bias and mistakes, I should have been more charitable.