10.
 
Re: Not impressed
Jun 8, 2011, 07:36
Dev
10.
Re: Not impressed Jun 8, 2011, 07:36
Jun 8, 2011, 07:36
Dev
 
MrTA wrote on Jun 8, 2011, 05:56:
blue ray player for their next console?
NOT blu-ray, read it, it says PROPRIETARY.
Possibly so people can't easily burn copies to play. But if its not blu-ray compatible they are going to miss out compared to ps3. Plus proprietary HD optical disk just screams expensive, both in the disks and in the reader.

I suppose its possible they are going to use normal blu-ray and just put a custom filesystem on it. That would be the least expensive way to go, and they could still offer blu ray movie playback in that case. But they are emphasizing proprietary for some reason so who knows.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 7, 2011Jun 7 2011
2.
Jun 7, 2011Jun 7 2011
5.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
4.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
8.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
9.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
12.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
6.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
7.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
 10.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
 Re: Not impressed
11.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
13.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
14.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
15.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011
16.
Jun 8, 2011Jun 8 2011