10 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 10. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 28, 2011, 11:24 |
Ratty |
|
|
| Actually bought FEAR 2 but only played about 10 minutes before giving up. 10 minutes was all I needed to see. I won't even bother checking previews or demos or anything for FEAR 3. Zero interest. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 28, 2011, 09:22 |
wtf_man |
|
|
theyarecomingforyou wrote on Apr 28, 2011, 08:27:
FEAR 2 was a solid, if unspectacular shooter. It was better than I expected and I actually thought it was better than the original game. Still, FEAR3 looks pretty terrible from what I've seen so far and I'm really not sure why they bothered.
FEAR was a solid, if unspectacular shooter.
FEAR2 looked pretty terrible from what I saw, and I'm really not sure why they bothered.
FEAR3 I don't know WTF they're thinking, and they shouldn't be wasting resources on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Did you even read cutters post or are you just suffering from rectal cranial inversion." - RedEye9 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 28, 2011, 08:27 |
theyarecomingforyou |
|
|
| FEAR 2 was a solid, if unspectacular shooter. It was better than I expected and I actually thought it was better than the original game. Still, FEAR3 looks pretty terrible from what I've seen so far and I'm really not sure why they bothered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8700K @ 4.9GHz / 32GB DDR4 / GTX 1080 OC
Optane 900P 280G |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 28, 2011, 06:15 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
Jerykk wrote on Apr 28, 2011, 00:23:
To be fair, FEAR2 was developed by Monolith and most people still considered it a failure. FEAR simply didn't need sequels. It was a fully self-contained game that would have been better left alone. WB is just milking it at this point, just like Vivendi was before.
FEAR 2 was alright... better than a lot of other FPS games released in the past 5 years. It just wasn't anywhere near as good as FEAR, which makes people hate it. Sort of like Crysis 2.
This one looks even worse though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 28, 2011, 00:23 |
Jerykk |
|
|
it has since the day it was announced with day 1 doing it and not monolith.
To be fair, FEAR2 was developed by Monolith and most people still considered it a failure. FEAR simply didn't need sequels. It was a fully self-contained game that would have been better left alone. WB is just milking it at this point, just like Vivendi was before.
I'm more interested in seeing what Monolith is working on right now. Hopefully it isn't a military shooter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 27, 2011, 20:44 |
the_culture |
|
|
Maybe they were afraid of competing against L.A. Noire?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 27, 2011, 20:17 |
Nucas |
|
|
StingingVelvet wrote on Apr 27, 2011, 19:25:
Everything about this game screams fail at this point.
it has since the day it was announced with day 1 doing it and not monolith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 27, 2011, 19:57 |
Overon |
|
|
| If a game gets delayed a few times like this, I think it's most probable that the publisher is not happy with the quality of it. I could be wrong though of course. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 27, 2011, 19:57 |
shponglefan |
|
|
| Oh noes! Now I have to wait even longer for a game I have no intention of playing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: F.E.A.R. 3 Delayed |
Apr 27, 2011, 19:25 |
StingingVelvet |
|
|
| Everything about this game screams fail at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
10 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
