ockky wrote on Dec 3, 2010, 16:34:
JoeNapalm wrote on Dec 3, 2010, 16:25:
The whole point of my original statement is - if they're calling this class a "Wizard" in-house, then that alone tells you quite a lot as to where their though process is...which is, clearly, Fighter/Rogue/Wizard/Priest.
I, for one, am not interested in "Star WoW".
Clearly you've not played WoW, otherwise you'd know that there is no 'wizard' class,
also, if you want to use quotes on me, how about you use the quote that goes something along the lines of describing 'ol ben' as a 'crazy old wizard' ...
finally, this is clearly the nerdiest fucking thread i've ever decided to pipe-in on lol
A) "Clearly" you didn't read my whole post, as I DID
use that quote. Well played. (And yeah, that is sarcasm.)
B) WoW has no wizard class? WTF do you call a MAGE?! Forgive me if English is not your first language, or if you have some other reason for not understanding that they are the same bloody thing!
Do you not grasp what I am saying here? It would be easier if you read whole posts, rather than forming an opinion halfway through, but my whole point is that they're using standard fantasy RPG archetypes as established by bloody CHAINMAIL, before you were a gleam in your daddy's eye.
What was I saying? Something about decorum? Anyway...