Op Ed

Greywardens.com - Is Dragon Age II the End of BioWare as a Traditional RPG Creator?
Teasing me with something as open and infinitely superior in its complexity as was Dragon Age: Origins, only to follow up with something that is simply NOT in the same style or genre, is completely and utterly unfair. As a gamer and a fan, I care how much profit BioWare makes only insofar as it keeps them afloat to continue making more cool stuff that I like. Selfish, but true of most gamers. I don’t want to see things get blanded away from the features and elements that made BioWare my favourite game maker. While I understand their need to grow and expand, on an intellectual level, I am thoroughly disheartened at this turn of events.

View : : :
59.
 
Re: Op Ed
Jul 14, 2010, 12:56
59.
Re: Op Ed Jul 14, 2010, 12:56
Jul 14, 2010, 12:56
 
These guys must be like those Japanese developers who don't know how to produce modern graphics!

I honestly think that they just like Half-Life/Playstation 2 texture detail. I guess they think it looks pretty to have rolling green landscapes where the ground is a blur of crap texture quality while running off of modern game engines.

It's honestly quasi disturbing and makes me want to smack them for their utter and complete *INCOMPETANCE*.

How the fuck do you buy a modern game engine and FAIL SO ABYSMALLY TO PROVIDE THE BASIC LEVEL OF DETAIL THAT SAID GAME ENGINE IS ALL ABOUT?!!

They go out and pay for a modern game engine and they don't even have a CLUE as to WTF THEY SHOULD BE DOING WITH THEMSELVES.

"Yeah, those screens scare the hell out of me."

You should have noticed that there was a reason for the extra-excited response. Some things in life have to matter at some point.

Garbage in, garbage out.

*FLUSH*

This comment was edited on Jul 14, 2010, 13:06.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
4.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
5.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
7.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
   Re: Op Ed
6.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
15.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
2.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
3.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
8.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
9.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
10.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
11.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
12.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
13.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
14.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
16.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
17.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
18.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
19.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
   Re: Op Ed
20.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
    Re: Op Ed
21.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
     Re: Op Ed
22.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
      Re: Op Ed
23.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
       Re: Op Ed
24.
Jul 11, 2010Jul 11 2010
      Re: Op Ed
33.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
      Re: Op Ed
29.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
     Re: Op Ed
32.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
     Re: Op Ed
36.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
      Re: Op Ed
37.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
       Re: Op Ed
39.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
       Re: Op Ed
40.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
        Re: Op Ed
42.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
         Re: Op Ed
51.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
          Re: Op Ed
43.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
         Re: Op Ed
44.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
          Re: Op Ed
45.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
           Re: Op Ed
46.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
            Re: Op Ed
47.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
            Re: Op Ed
48.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
             Re: Op Ed
50.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
              Re: Op Ed
52.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
               Re: Op Ed
53.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
                Re: Op Ed
56.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
                 Re: Op Ed
57.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
                  Re: Op Ed
54.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
      Re: Op Ed
55.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
       Re: Op Ed
25.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
26.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
27.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
28.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
30.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
38.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
31.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
34.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
35.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
41.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
49.
Jul 12, 2010Jul 12 2010
58.
Jul 13, 2010Jul 13 2010
 59.
Jul 14, 2010Jul 14 2010
Re: Op Ed