Blizzard on Real ID [Jul 07, 2010, 8:10 pm ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
Blizzard tells Gamasutra they are "definitely listening to player feedback" about Real ID, and the recent revelation that this would require the use of "real names" to post to the StarCraft II forums (though they admit that any name can be registered, though it will be associated with your unique CD key). So far the outcry from fans would indicate the program is not receiving the reception they hoped for: "Real ID is a new and different concept for Blizzard gamers -- and for us as well -- and our goal is to create a social gaming service that players want to use." In any event, it doesn't sound like they are reconsidering the plan, as they explain its optional nature. "It's important to note that both enabling Real ID in game and posting on the official Blizzard forums are completely optional," the Blizzard rep said. "Players can continue to read the forums anonymously regardless of whether they choose to post in them, and their gameplay experiences will not change if they choose not to use the Real ID communication features in game."
It's not really optional though. "Turn on this shitty feature or never be allowed to post on our forums" which include things like Customer Service, Feedback and Technical Support isn't terribly optional. I've read that it automatically spiders your RealID list with anyone you happen to add to boot.
Saying stuff like "well dont buy the game then" isn't helpful, you're just trying to shut down discussion because your opinion differs. Duh, of course people are going to vote with their wallet. They don't want to be forced to do so because they love Blizzard products and they're trying to show Blizzard that this is a horrible idea.
Any situation where your company is forcing something undesirable on the customer isn't a good one. Jesus, some of you will white knight something like this then have the nerve to call me a corporate shill, LOL. There is nothing good about this whatsoever for the consumer, it can only be a negative.
Saying stuff like "well dont buy the game then" isn't helpful, you're just trying to shut down discussion because your opinion differs. Duh, of course people are going to vote with their wallet. They don't want to be forced to do so because they love Blizzard products and they're trying to show Blizzard that this is a horrible idea.
Any situation where your company is forcing something undesirable on the customer isn't a good one. Jesus, some of you will white knight something like this then have the nerve to call me a corporate shill, LOL. There is nothing good about this whatsoever for the consumer, it can only be a negative.
Playing: Elden Ring, HZD: FW, Kingdom Rush series
Watching: Severance, The IT Crowd, The Batman
Watching: Severance, The IT Crowd, The Batman
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2022 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2022 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 18 May 2022, 00:34.