Wardell on Impulse::Reactor

Stardock's Wardell Details Impulse Reactor Specifics on Gamasutra talks with Stardock CEO Brad Wardell about Impulse::Reactor, and what it means to gamers, developers, and publishers. Here's a bit:
Like Steamworks and Games for Windows Live, Impulse Reactor is offered free to developers -- but unlike those services, it doesn't require users to maintain accounts on those systems. So what's in it for Stardock?

"The requirement is that the developer has to put their title on Impulse, non-exclusively, and the benefit to us is that they're not using Steamworks," Wardell said. "When someone uses Steamworks, that leads to everything being on Steam, and that's a non-ideal situation for us."

"If they spend $10 million making a PC game, they don't want an SDK to come in and steal their experience," he went on. "This is something we heard loud and clear about Games for Windows Live in particular -- 'I have my game, and all of a sudden here's this bubbly interface.' Hey, Games for Windows: you didn't spend the money to make the game; don't hijack the experience as if it's somehow your game. And that applies to anyone who tries to inject their experience into the user's face."
View : : :
9.
 
Just make it work reliably.
Mar 17, 2010, 01:29
9.
Just make it work reliably. Mar 17, 2010, 01:29
Mar 17, 2010, 01:29
 
Like Steamworks and Games for Windows Live, Impulse Reactor is offered free to developers -- but unlike those services, it doesn't require users to maintain accounts on those systems....When someone uses Steamworks, that leads to everything being on Steam
Amen, Brad, now make it work reliably.

Small game developers really need a free, open multiplayer infrastructure like this. Rolling their own solution is too complicated and unreliable, Gamespy is too expensive, and Steam is too restrictive, selective, and excluding. If Stardock can pull this off without dropping the ball or restricting developers who use it, more power to it.

This comment was edited on Mar 17, 2010, 01:37.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
7.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
8.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
10.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
20.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
2.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
3.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
4.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
5.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
11.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
12.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
19.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
14.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
15.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
16.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
6.
Mar 16, 2010Mar 16 2010
 9.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
Just make it work reliably.
17.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
18.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
23.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
24.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010
    Here it is.
13.
Mar 17, 2010Mar 17 2010