Never before saw a post with so much wrong in one place.
Likewise.
Larrabee is DoA
No, it isn't. It's not surprising that you think this, Intel really messed up their marketing on this. Larrabee is not DoA. It's alive. It's well. A card will be announced later this year. Intel was experiencing delays but wanted the technology out there, so they've released as an R&D platform with the consumer platform delayed until at least 2011. But it's still in development.
Fermi is big, loud and runs very hot. Nvidia is having big problems with the yields and they're hiding benchmarks from the press for a reason. Fermi will most likely launch very expensive anyways and ATI now owns the market top to bottom on price anyways
All very true. The yields are rumored to be around 2%, but that's an overexaggeration. It's hot and, despite being much more expensive, it's not blowing the 5870 away outside of tessallation. That doesn't mean that it's not going to be a very powerful technology. You need to remember it's not just a step forward but a step to the side. It's going to take an interation or two to mature. That doesn't mean it won't ultimately be the path to follow.
Listen, I'm sorry you're misinformed about Larrabee. Again, I blame Intel's PR for that, but you should at least acknowledge that you're wrong there. I'm also sorry that you're writing off Fermi before it's even launched, let alone grown. People around here keep complaining that PC technology is stagnating, yet here are two technologies that have a chance to change that, yet some of you are condeming them before they even show themselves.
More frightening, you're calling others wrong when they're telling the truth.