How is suggesting that you may (note that the statement is conditional) hold a belief held by many Christians considered an ad-hominem attack?

It's not addressing my argument, but me.

It proves -- in your own words -- that scientists have neither "been able to show what is theorized to have happened" nor have they "figured it out yet."

("not figured it out" is the other side of the universe from others' references to "flying spaghetti monsters" and "superstitious Jews.")

If scientists have not been able to "figure it out" -- that means "show empirically" -- then why do so many act as though it is fact?

Science is not advanced by denying its principles.

There's as much empirical evidence for a giant bunny hatching the universe as Darwin's Creation Myth.

-Christ confirmed Moses' writings as truthful. Based on the empirical evidence we possess, I believe that Christ is trustworthy.

"Maybe" is not what Darwinism claims.

"Science hasn't and never will," and, "Christ is trustworthy and said He did."

When God speaks it is entirely possible that those listening are able to relate accurately what He said.

It's firmly "less" because you're making things up for the sake of argument, not relating actual experience.