16 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
 |
| 16. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 25, 2009, 10:46 |
Kxmode |
|
|
Bah. Real gamers still have their boxed retail copies. :)
Or the copy they obtained illegally from co-workers for after-work LAN skirmishes. What?! Don't look at me like that!
This comment was edited on Nov 25, 2009, 10:46. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "It is possible to synthesize excited bromide in an argon matrix. It’s an excimer frozen in its excited state." |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 15. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 20:50 |
Scottish Martial Arts |
|
|
Yeah, I just wanted everything under the b.net store, since I can login and download my other blizz games from there.
Bah. Real gamers still have their boxed retail copies. 
This comment was edited on Nov 23, 2009, 20:51. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 16:57 |
Sempai |
|
|
Um..DUH!
Why is this even news worthy?.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 13. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 16:37 |
nin |
|
|
The B.net edition works fine on Windows 7 for me. Not sure about my originals. They are probably lost anyway. WC1 works fine via DosBOX. Not exactly what you wanted, but I thought it was worth mentioning.
Yeah, I just wanted everything under the b.net store, since I can login and download my other blizz games from there.
But thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 12. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 16:36 |
LittleMe |
|
|
| It's already been over seven years since WC3 came out. That's plenty of time for interest to wane already. No? Maybe not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Perpetual debt is slavery. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 11. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 16:29 |
MattyC |
|
|
"Really wish they'd get the first 2 Warcraft games running with modern OSs and offer them on the Blizzard store."
You can't get them from the B.net store, but you can pick them up at plenty of other places. The B.net edition works fine on Windows 7 for me. Not sure about my originals. They are probably lost anyway. WC1 works fine via DosBOX. Not exactly what you wanted, but I thought it was worth mentioning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 10. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 15:46 |
DukeFNukem |
|
|
Sweet. Im just happy to know its going to happen. God forbid they waste 3-5 years creating another boring MMO title that I refuse to pay for. Not only do I refuse to pay for the inital software investment but the monthly fee as well. If they would give their crappy software away for free they might get more subscribers. Im not saying they are hurting for subscribers or anything but it might get something out of a few people who would never buy the game just to have to pay more money to play it. The monthly fee kills it for me personally. I want Warcraft 4 first. And who cares about whether its a new IP if its fun. Warcraft III is probably the greatest videogame ever created in terms of replayability and quality.
This comment was edited on Nov 23, 2009, 16:14. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Just because you aren't afraid of something doesn't it mean it can't hurt you... |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 9. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 15:00 |
Hump |
|
|
Their nextgen MMO is a brand-new IP.
which is years off..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Both the “left” and the “right” pretend they have the answer, but they are mere flippers on the same thalidomide baby, and the truth is that neither side has a clue."
- Jim Goad |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 8. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 14:59 |
Cutter |
|
|
| Yeah, if they haven't started it it'll be more like 7. In other words don't hold your breath. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "Hey! Nobody calls Moe St. Cool a phony!" |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 7. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 14:39 |
nin |
|
|
Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off
No shit. Starcraft 2 is probably years off.
Warcraft 4 Probably Years Decades Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 6. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 14:25 |
Prez |
|
|
Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off
No shit. Starcraft 2 is probably years off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”
- Mahatma Gandhi |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 5. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 12:36 |
Kxmode |
|
|
HEY Blizzard how about a NEW IP?
Their nextgen MMO is a brand-new IP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "It is possible to synthesize excited bromide in an argon matrix. It’s an excimer frozen in its excited state." |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 4. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 12:06 |
Umbragen |
|
|
| Years off? Shouldn't they be hyping the shit out of it already? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 3. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 11:54 |
nin |
|
|
Not surprising.
Really wish they'd get the first 2 Warcraft games running with modern OSs and offer them on the Blizzard store. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 11:53 |
Techie714 © |
|
|
I'm calling it, Warcraft 4 2016!
HEY Blizzard how about a NEW IP? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1. |
Re: Warcraft 4 Probably Years Off |
Nov 23, 2009, 11:47 |
Kxmode |
|
|
| They probably get bored with a project and likely want to go in a whole new direction. Having three IPs like Diablo, Warcraft, and Starcraft gives them great variety to mix things up. I'd imagine after working on a gritty world like StarCraft 2, they'll be ready to revisit Warcraft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| "It is possible to synthesize excited bromide in an argon matrix. It’s an excimer frozen in its excited state." |
|
|
|
|
| |
16 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
< Newer [ 1 ] Older >
|
|
Twitter 
