StarCraft II LAN Still a Possibility

It's possible StarCraft II will have a workaround to allow play on a Local Area Network following the uproar over previous indications that Blizzard's RTS sequel will not include LAN support. Kotaku brought this up with Rob Pardo, and he seemed amused at the idea that people will still consider this an issue when the game is released, indicating that in cases where no 'net connection is available, there may still be ways to play: "There's a few legitimate cases that we're going to try and address over time. Location-based tournaments, or let's say I'm in a dorm with a firewall or something like that, hopefully there's a way to determine that and maybe start a peer-to-peer game." Likewise, Shacknews raised the possibility in a conversation with Battle.net developer Greg Canessa work on a solution to support low latency/high bandwidth situations where they asked if such a solution could provide "pseudo-LAN" support with Battle.Net authentication for local games: "Something like that," he told them. "Maintaining a connection with Battle.net, I don't know if it's once or periodically, but then also having a peer-to-peer connection between players to facilitate a very low-ping, high-bandwidth connection.. those are the things that we're working on." They also confirm with Jay Wilson that Diablo III will deal with LANs the same way StarCraft II does, so it should support any such programming created for StarCraft II.
View : : :
53.
 
Re: StarCraft II LAN Still a Possibility
Aug 25, 2009, 19:05
53.
Re: StarCraft II LAN Still a Possibility Aug 25, 2009, 19:05
Aug 25, 2009, 19:05
 
For one, the game acknowledged the little things you did. Hanging out in the women's bathroom, leaving Gunther in his cell at liberty island, killing the first terrorist guy, etc.

Yes, it was cool when you could use the vending machines in Duke3d also, but that doesn't make a game great.

As for the superficial choices, yeah, they're pretty superficial... but you don't realize that until after you've beaten the game. When I had to make the choice between killing the french guy or killing that russian chick (too tired to recall her name), that felt meaningful. It also felt meaningful when I had to stay and fight with Paul or abandon him. Neither of these choices drastically changed the game but they sure felt important when I had to make them.

And that bothered me. Finding out those choices were a gimmick made the game feel hollow to me. Anti-climactic and disappointing.

Deus Ex also allowed for a lot of emergent gameplay.

To take a lot of damage and quickly skip past a lot of enemies isn't exactly unique. You can do it in any game that offers a roof or ledge where enemies can't follow you. It's like the gameplay equivalent of running past a bunch of enemies, something any speedrun will take advantage of. This isn't really a good example since you can just call rocket jumping in quake 1 "emergent gameplay"

But I understand what you're saying. Deus Ex offered you gameplay choices, at a time when that wasn't very common in gaming. But for me, the mere presence of choices means little, if you're choosing between mediocre gunplay, mediocre stealthplay, mediocre hacking minigames, etc. What that amounts to for me is a mediocre experience, albeit one of my choosing. I'd venture further to say that, since you know that you can either blast your way through a mission or stealth your way through, the availablity of choice detracts from the game experience. Where is the tension and suspense of a proper stealth game when you know that if you fuck up, you can switch some augs and just fight your way through? A game like Beyond good and Evil does a much better job of making stealth co-exist with action.

In the end, the gunfights weren't as thrilling as Half Life, the sneaking wasn't as well done as thief, the world wasn't as immersive or intense as the Shock games, the choices/RPG elements weren't as meaningful as Fallout, and story, well the story sucked. Is Deus Ex better than Crysis? Sure, why not, but neither of them are anything special.

Ken Levine, now there's a man who knows how to make a fantastic game.

This comment was edited on Aug 25, 2009, 19:33.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
2.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
4.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
3.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
5.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
7.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
8.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
12.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
9.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
10.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
14.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
15.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
17.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
11.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
13.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
18.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
19.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
20.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
21.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
22.
Aug 23, 2009Aug 23 2009
33.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
34.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
36.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
38.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
48.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
39.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
40.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
42.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
41.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
24.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
26.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
29.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
30.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
32.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
50.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
35.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
37.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
43.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
44.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
46.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
47.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
49.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
52.
Aug 25, 2009Aug 25 2009
 53.
Aug 25, 2009Aug 25 2009
    Re: StarCraft II LAN Still a Possibility
54.
Aug 27, 2009Aug 27 2009
55.
Aug 27, 2009Aug 27 2009
56.
Sep 5, 2009Sep 5 2009
45.
Aug 24, 2009Aug 24 2009
51.
Aug 25, 2009Aug 25 2009